From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0s6b-0001zy-Rl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:29:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B44EE0985; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BEAE0985 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rohan.altum.de (p5DC81464.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.200.20.100]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LzWOk-1M6U7J1Plq-014pOO; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:29:03 +0200 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:28:30 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion References: <4AD9E8C9.3000605@alice.it> Message-ID: <200910220928.35198.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> From: "Dirk Heinrichs" Received: from gondolin.localnet (gondolin.altum.de [192.168.1.4]) by rohan.altum.de; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:28:35 +0200 Organization: Privat User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.4; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; ) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2445525.2GmE4rh0NP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/VjLhu6RQeGUEgRe/HXzrZZwxjVh8uho0VX5p jV3E8Sg1sHgSnNei2qzAcU4FAaEIAPH/HBTh6eA7+dfZhwa2lJ etlF+IcULejsxBBOSMeHg== X-Archives-Salt: e6c9975d-20c7-4675-bd57-72390061412a X-Archives-Hash: f5963d026a6d081dd0a8374210435e0f --nextPart2445525.2GmE4rh0NP Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag 17 Oktober 2009 17:54:49 schrieb econti: > Is there any other solution? The same problem came up on gentoo-user-de yesterday, too. One replier told= us=20 that there was a portage news item about this topic: "2009-09-27-qt_use_changes Title Qt 4.5.2 default USE flag changes Author Alex Alexander Posted 2009-09-27 Revision 1 Qt version 4.5.2 has significant changes in the USE flags enabled by default. When upgrading, make sure you check and re-enable any USE flags you need. Depending on your system and installed packages, you might hit an issue where Portage is getting confused by this USE flag change, trying to mix old 4.5.1 ebuilds with new 4.5.2 ones, resulting in blocks. If this happens to you, please add the offending USE flags (usually 'qt3support' and 'dbus') in your USE=3D or switch to a desktop profile (eselect profile list). Check this post [0] for more details on this issue. [0] http://www.linuxized.com/p192" So it could be a good idea to read your portage news. HTH... Dirk =20 --nextPart2445525.2GmE4rh0NP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBK4Amj8NVtnsLkZ7sRAnj5AJ9hqdH3xn1qL8wnrUlQ+W9v68P//ACgo97C ou9rxpBRLEayBVcrGWSLf1s= =Aish -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2445525.2GmE4rh0NP--