[gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Hi,

I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here
is using it and if they are having any problems with it.  I'm using a
desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages.  No servers or
anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my
kernel.

If you are using this with no problems, please let me know that and
whether you have a similar setup.  My last gcc upgrade was no fun.

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here
> is using it 

yes

> and if they are having any problems with it. 

no

> I'm using a
> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages. 

me too

> No servers or
> anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my
> kernel.

vanilla-sources here.

gcc-porting helped tho

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here
>> is using it 
>>     
>
> yes
>
>   
>> and if they are having any problems with it. 
>>     
>
> no
>
>   
>> I'm using a
>> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages. 
>>     
>
> me too
>
>   
>> No servers or
>> anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my
>> kernel.
>>     
>
> vanilla-sources here.
>
> gcc-porting helped tho
>
>
>   

Thanks.  What exactly is gcc-porting?  I did a quick search and found a
page on freshmeat but it seemed to be related to MS-DOS or something. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here
> >> is using it
> >
> > yes
> >
> >> and if they are having any problems with it.
> >
> > no
> >
> >> I'm using a
> >> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages.
> >
> > me too
> >
> >> No servers or
> >> anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my
> >> kernel.
> >
> > vanilla-sources here.
> >
> > gcc-porting helped tho
> 
> Thanks.  What exactly is gcc-porting?  I did a quick search and found a
> page on freshmeat but it seemed to be related to MS-DOS or something.
> 
> Dale
> 
> :-)  :-)
> 

gcc-porting overlay, install via layman. It had some ebuild/package versions 
that were patched to compile with gcc4.4. AFAIK it is not needed anymore.

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Nikos Chantziaras]

On 10/01/2009 07:50 AM, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here
> is using it and if they are having any problems with it.  I'm using a
> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages.  No servers or
> anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my
> kernel.
>
> If you are using this with no problems, please let me know that and
> whether you have a similar setup.  My last gcc upgrade was no fun.

Lots of people are using it.  It looks pretty good; here's a bug that 
tracks stuff broken with 4.4:

   http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249226

As you can see, the vast majority of them have been fixed.

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote:
>   
>>
>> Thanks.  What exactly is gcc-porting?  I did a quick search and found a
>> page on freshmeat but it seemed to be related to MS-DOS or something.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-)
>>
>>     
>
> gcc-porting overlay, install via layman. It had some ebuild/package versions 
> that were patched to compile with gcc4.4. AFAIK it is not needed anymore.
>
>
>   

I saw something about overlay somewhere while I was looking for info.  I
don't do the overlay thing.  Just a plain old tree for me.  Glad to know
it is not needed now.  Whew!

Thanks for the info tho. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 10/01/2009 07:50 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here
>> is using it and if they are having any problems with it.  I'm using a
>> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages.  No servers or
>> anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my
>> kernel.
>>
>> If you are using this with no problems, please let me know that and
>> whether you have a similar setup.  My last gcc upgrade was no fun.
>
> Lots of people are using it.  It looks pretty good; here's a bug that
> tracks stuff broken with 4.4:
>
>   http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249226
>
> As you can see, the vast majority of them have been fixed.
>
>
>

It does look pretty good.  Hopefully this will be better than the last
upgrade.  Seamonkey went goofy and I couldn't compile a kernel at all. 
I don't know what happened.

Giving this some more thought before jumping in tho.  ;-) 

Thanks much.

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 550 bytes --]

On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:15:11 -0500, Dale wrote:

> It does look pretty good.  Hopefully this will be better than the last
> upgrade.  Seamonkey went goofy and I couldn't compile a kernel at all. 
> I don't know what happened.
> 
> Giving this some more thought before jumping in tho.  ;-) 

4.4 is slotted, so you can keep 4.3 around until you know everything
works with the newer version, although I removed 4.3 some time ago
because I never needed it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Celery is not food. It is a member of the plywood family.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:15:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>   
>> It does look pretty good.  Hopefully this will be better than the last
>> upgrade.  Seamonkey went goofy and I couldn't compile a kernel at all. 
>> I don't know what happened.
>>
>> Giving this some more thought before jumping in tho.  ;-) 
>>     
>
> 4.4 is slotted, so you can keep 4.3 around until you know everything
> works with the newer version, although I removed 4.3 some time ago
> because I never needed it.
>
>
>   

I'm still on this:

i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.2

gcc-4.3 was a bust for me.  Stuff crashing, couldn't compile a kernel
and a few other weird things.  I went back to 4.1 and left 4.3 alone. 

Thanks for the info.  It's compiling right now.  Boy it is big.

Dale

:-)  :-) 

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Nikos Chantziaras]

On 10/01/2009 11:45 AM, Dale wrote:
> Thanks for the info.  It's compiling right now.  Boy it is big.

That's what she said.

(Sorry, couldn't resist :P)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 10/01/2009 11:45 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Thanks for the info.  It's compiling right now.  Boy it is big.
>
> That's what she said.
>
> (Sorry, couldn't resist :P)
>
>
>

I was trying to make Nikos into a girl for a second there.  LOL  I need
to get some sleep. 

It's compiled and I'm about to switch.  It said something about running
fix_libtool_files.sh for the libstdc++.la stuff.  Hmmmm, always
something.  I'm going to do a emerge -e system at a minimum anyway.

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Sebastian Beßler]

Dale schrieb:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 10/01/2009 11:45 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> Thanks for the info.  It's compiling right now.  Boy it is big.
>> That's what she said.
>>
>> (Sorry, couldn't resist :P)
>>
>>
>>
> 
> I was trying to make Nikos into a girl for a second there.  LOL  I need
> to get some sleep. 
> 
> It's compiled and I'm about to switch.  It said something about running
> fix_libtool_files.sh for the libstdc++.la stuff.  Hmmmm, always
> something.  I'm going to do a emerge -e system at a minimum anyway.

You should do fix_libtool_files.sh before the emerge -e system it only
takes a few minutes (even less here) and you are on a safer side.

Greetings

Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Dale schrieb:
>   
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>     
>>> On 10/01/2009 11:45 AM, Dale wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Thanks for the info.  It's compiling right now.  Boy it is big.
>>>>         
>>> That's what she said.
>>>
>>> (Sorry, couldn't resist :P)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> I was trying to make Nikos into a girl for a second there.  LOL  I need
>> to get some sleep. 
>>
>> It's compiled and I'm about to switch.  It said something about running
>> fix_libtool_files.sh for the libstdc++.la stuff.  Hmmmm, always
>> something.  I'm going to do a emerge -e system at a minimum anyway.
>>     
>
> You should do fix_libtool_files.sh before the emerge -e system it only
> takes a few minutes (even less here) and you are on a safer side.
>
> Greetings
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>   

Yup, it took about three seconds but didn't emerge anything so I guess I
am good to go.  Yeppie!!

Dale

:-)  :-)

P. S.  Dale crosses fingers, toes and anything else that I can cross.  I
hope this goes better than last time.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Sebastian Beßler]

Dale schrieb:

> Yup, it took about three seconds but didn't emerge anything so I guess I
> am good to go.  Yeppie!!

Thats normal, because it never emerges anything. It only changes
references by patching files.

Greetings

Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Stroller]

On 1 Oct 2009, at 06:38, Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> ...
>> gcc-porting helped tho
>
> Thanks.  What exactly is gcc-porting?

Well, duh! It's where you enlarge & polish the compiler's intake  
valves, to improve airflow.

Stroller.

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Paul Hartman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here
> is using it and if they are having any problems with it.  I'm using a
> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages.  No servers or
> anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my
> kernel.
>

I'm using ~amd64 with same kernel, KDE4, gcc-4.4.1 and no problems. I'm even
using the "graphite" USE flag & the loop-related cflags. Nothing has blown
up (yet). :)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 864 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Dale]

Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com
> <mailto:rdalek1967@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if
>     anyone here
>     is using it and if they are having any problems with it.  I'm using a
>     desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages.  No
>     servers or
>     anything to worry about like apache.  Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6
>     for my
>     kernel.
>
>
> I'm using ~amd64 with same kernel, KDE4, gcc-4.4.1 and no problems.
> I'm even using the "graphite" USE flag & the loop-related cflags.
> Nothing has blown up (yet). :)

It has finished the emerge -e system so far.  Not a single failure that
I can see.  Do have to update a config file tho.  ;-)

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Mike Edenfield]

On 10/1/2009 6:26 PM, Dale wrote:

> It has finished the emerge -e system so far.  Not a single failure that
> I can see.  Do have to update a config file tho.  ;-)

In case anyone's keeping score, I've been using gcc-4.4 with the 
hardened profile (from the hardened-development overlay, of course) for 
a good while, and the only problems I've run into are hardened related. 
  It has built OOo, Gnome, Gimp, Firefox, Emacs, and even CLISP with no 
apparent problems so far.

--Mike

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[kashani]

Stroller wrote:
> 
> On 1 Oct 2009, at 06:38, Dale wrote:
>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>> ...
>>> gcc-porting helped tho
>>
>> Thanks.  What exactly is gcc-porting?
> 
> Well, duh! It's where you enlarge & polish the compiler's intake valves, 
> to improve airflow.
> 
> Stroller.
> 

	Do you have to add larger jets to your proprocessor as well?

kashani, moto geeks unite!

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Samstag 03 Oktober 2009, kashani wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
> > On 1 Oct 2009, at 06:38, Dale wrote:
> >> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> gcc-porting helped tho
> >>
> >> Thanks.  What exactly is gcc-porting?
> >
> > Well, duh! It's where you enlarge & polish the compiler's intake valves,
> > to improve airflow.
> >
> > Stroller.
> 
> 	Do you have to add larger jets to your proprocessor as well?
> 
> kashani, moto geeks unite!
> 

don't forget the exhaust profile!