From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mroby-0003JQ-4o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:56:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BACD8E07E0; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E508E07E0 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so3727052ewy.14 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:56:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=JQ8wK2OiCgl+Ga36eW+XWTL9bO4AETu0lgd0yUtCaJk=; b=lJ1vNuZoAUziYyIstwNVqouXgzaRWiPsgiOOfHbEkTu4m12EbeniTcimkSfoIr60kP uSUIp8X8hj7D77vsX5naj9EjAKjfG5aOcvA08iImvPnh1oqDKAhyw8Oae2BPARYsuxIl ffbZpY3A6lrTlRML/JpI2JB5AMmmby0FTMDrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=fHL6Ppr4AP7yQa0DGR72sELedFokoRH1nbcLk+CYpNAyfSgcA/4cr4Bc5BzGSFqEgk zdwqK4EtwHcIWKB1L5AS5o6/3gZqfnVRlZE3w7a5YLwnyCGmA6RnUo1oqIxn0i0J0wqq hnl/fMa3QfaJVc3jlIbrzafjznIYq+7pO+YXI= Received: by 10.210.96.12 with SMTP id t12mr1683717ebb.71.1254038160003; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.study (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1934433eyb.12.2009.09.27.00.55.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:55:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Does portage monkey directly with /etc/portage/package.use Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:55:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090927012338.GA12732@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: <20090927012338.GA12732@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2515190.65SLZFP8BJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909270855.57149.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 42a767de-94b1-41dd-a7db-abeeb200456c X-Archives-Hash: 64a83257c1f9673bde2f38dfda8ee297 --nextPart2515190.65SLZFP8BJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 27 September 2009, Walter Dnes wrote: > After an update, I was going through /var/log/portage/elog and came > across a "WARN: setup" message that the "gpgme" flag had been renamed to > "gpg". Looking at /etc/portage/package.use I saw, amongst other things > > mail-client/mutt buffysize > mail-client/mutt gpgme > mail-client/mutt pop > mail-client/mutt smime > mail-client/mutt smtp > > *THAT IS NOT MY EDITING STYLE*. I put the options on one line, like so > > media-video/mplayer alsa i8x0 mmxext real ssse3 > > Unless someone has been sneaking into my place and editing > /etc/portage/package.use, I can only assume that this has been done by > portage. Am I paranoid? To complete the diagnosis we may need the version of your portage? ;-) I'm on sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.1 and the syntax is on one line. I don't kno= w=20 what happens with the [M]~ versions. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart2515190.65SLZFP8BJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkq/Go0ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbZ0QCg1GNGi23OCqFNkh6PNzqNjk0l XpIAoKlejrOmfx/05YcJrSZA0dUYsLfb =CZvM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2515190.65SLZFP8BJ--