From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mpm2T-00033L-Fa for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:46:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA3B9E0863; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80500E0863 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so1972032bwz.34 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:46:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=Z4EctQhzrKFCiCEarN/rDo6LGsgI24JDIwedCBK7w1A=; b=dwVOtj5OodKyJTz55Mu4DC8RhRQwKl0PCPiCiHG8BfTM1j4/u2COXa4hFLpnL0awjd mmqsuGzbVFRKMctLtxMmzt2HpFshjIgn1kdv2qhr9OnhL+7a0i2rGr9xQYYdg7t8bIIO jHk+RgErdqMiksYXP7nZ2UmlGZHR7SYp0gqG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=UGwhprSq5xghSeJ8jaexbvywyrZSswt6CQUzaIBmOhtX06RMjbVwJW9pdJbfJxehnG rOze2GeLZoXtQ9EN4aliJMpaG68pIDurTn2PFPypTGIPYCLa1Ne+5etHgzg3kZnhoTZK Y8Ikk04XIkCeLGDdtUDz2zhFCdhydTg/4AbkQ= Received: by 10.204.7.86 with SMTP id c22mr4460045bkc.113.1253551614650; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.197.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y15sm15440fkd.57.2009.09.21.09.46.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:46:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Portage Feature Request Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:46:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31r4; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <5061b39c0909210916u38206918j41e7917609cb2f76@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5061b39c0909210916u38206918j41e7917609cb2f76@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909211846.49145.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 43adaf44-72d1-4b2a-9113-c156ede266a8 X-Archives-Hash: 583281ca5c9f1b41f1201f2db9e13108 a) wrong list b) please read this and think about it: http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/09/04/filtering-compiler-optimisation-flags-is-not- a-solution c) gentoo is about responsibility. You are responsible for the stuff you do. Gentoo tries not to get in your way if it can. What you ask for is completly against its basic philosophy: the user knows best what he wants.