From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-100308-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Mn7qM-0000sM-Le
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:27:30 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5A3CE0882;
	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:27:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839EEE0882
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:27:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so419219fga.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=rC3Gh3U7GFdSnZuH1xvQALv7thiLLak6Mb3M7fMR/jA=;
        b=IjwLyBRHR0e2iDcPXYdIRRiQUUcnIur5s5Mc8a8lDgBzBS+sgZGKF0BaBO/14/J5XC
         /r9L200cqw3BlKW39JKrFJlHY685wBKx+5RcQKf/BXXDcAYBqNvVDu859U9/cSblLMn+
         gbWL5bXNHMYZXarHMtpOyf0EIJeoMAHIRcn3c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        b=nZ10sclRZK43nPhqDtR7JSrIc6nur+8sxBnpReriolpcG29W4/1W+Y7zfm+7LqNF7q
         pt4rgu3Z8yqg6zfcBPhSbqtNoKi6iEhLoRr32t/8+Z/vo8rcVbm/zGSBJReVE0FMhvQT
         7gpBSM51VUBdq1DBGe7YkiR/E6Qa01rPEI1lQ=
Received: by 10.86.187.7 with SMTP id k7mr4759922fgf.30.1252920447942;
        Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-140-68-rrdg-esr-2.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.140.68])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm1159023fge.22.2009.09.14.02.27.26
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.30 and reiserfs?
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:25:49 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; )
References: <5602B0BD6D59AE4791BE83104940118D0146A2EB13@excprdmbxw002.optus.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <5602B0BD6D59AE4791BE83104940118D0146A2EB13@excprdmbxw002.optus.com.au>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200909141125.49642.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 69adefbd-3083-4f9e-a11d-26075f1d9548
X-Archives-Hash: 0d55d70b044c41dfb99f4449c55c9f0d

On Monday 14 September 2009 02:25:45 Adam Carter wrote:
> > I am using reiserfs just for my squid-cache nevertheless
> > after I booted
> > 2.6.30-r4 on an amd64 system, I couldn't create any files on that
> > partition. Is there a way to convert the partition to work or
> > do I really have to change filesystems?
> 
> I had some weirdness with .30 and reiser. I was using .30 sucessfully for a
>  few days, then had to hard reset but reiser had problems mounting on
>  reboot. I tried booting .30 twice with no luck. Booted .29 and it worked
>  fine - in fact no messages about the filesystem at all - it just loaded
>  normally. I didn't bother persuing it because I had read about similar
>  issues with .30 (IIRC on this list) and figured it was probably a kernel
>  bug....
> 

I have no issues whatsoever on this amd64 notebook with 2.6.30 and reiser. 
It's now on 2.6.31 and still working fine. My ancient x86 file server is still 
on 2.6.29, mostly as I'd read the same report you did.

The problematic combination reported then was x86, reiser, 2.6.30, IDE chipset

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com