From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-100279-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MmnNw-0007WQ-6k
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:36:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9A46E06BE;
	Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:36:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FB2E06BE
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:36:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rohan.altum.de (p5DC803DC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.200.3.220])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0MKt2u-1MmnNt3bOU-000SOe; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:36:45 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCC4C9673F
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:36:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gondolin.localnet (gondolin [192.168.1.4])
	(Authenticated sender: heini)
	by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DBBC9673B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:36:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
Organization: Privat
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel 2.6.30 gets no network
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:36:37 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; )
References: <9acccfe50909130342m5d7ae993s2281731ba796122c@mail.gmail.com> <h8ij9a$tnr$1@ger.gmane.org> <fecdbac60909130404v3d71a408yb6edc4f9fa10be1d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fecdbac60909130404v3d71a408yb6edc4f9fa10be1d@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200909131336.37215.dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/JAljhDlpvsmlrwxLtyXrcPiiZGutR2uvNAnP
 2x3MeMHrXbwR8SAvHYcvacwDruDZnYvsXZPiXLfLt3yA3ELsZF
 JL3WP9XdSc/DV/6mx5gOA==
X-Archives-Salt: ea6376f1-ed65-4940-9747-a7e0e3a56ac8
X-Archives-Hash: f8dd3025c0a273da1e9ac3e81e771a59

Am Sonntag 13 September 2009 13:04:37 schrieb Arttu V.:
> On 9/13/09, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> > On 09/13/2009 01:48 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:kogorman@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> Umm.  I just looked at the .config files, and it appears the interfaces
> >> are supported by the config option  CONFIG_EEPRO100=y
> >> which is not even present in the 2.6.30 file.  Eeeek! Is my system now
> >> unsupportable?
> >
> > It's CONFIG_E100:
> >
> Yes, a different(?) driver is to be used apparently (code duplication
> reductions?):
> 
> "e100: add support for 82552 10/100 adapter"

Yep. It's these kind of changes that make me go through make menuconfig once 
after major version upgrades.

BTW: There's no need for "make oldconfig" in this case.

Bye...

	Dirk