From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MkLaM-0005OE-9P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:31:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8356E0884; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A673CE0884 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3470DECD3 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:31:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hn-UFK5g1u55 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:31:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.ethnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0CBDECCD for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:31:31 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Making sure I am a good netizen and secure. Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:31:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4AA235B9.90306@gmail.com> <4AA37595.1050709@gmail.com> <200909061149.13087.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200909061149.13087.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909061831.27243.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 089d3b24-4797-404d-88d0-8094869d1cee X-Archives-Hash: 0e5e1c4e166485d03cf593f34de8a6b3 On Sunday 06 September 2009 10:49:13 Alan McKinnon wrote: > One thing [kde:4] definitely is not, is the next evolution of KDE-3. > Comparisons with KDE-3 are going result in disappointment Well, that seems to condemn v4 out of hand :-) . If it can't compare favourably with its predecessor, what's it doing there at all? I'm working quite hard at getting used to it (it's even the default grub choice), but it's uphill all the way. -- Rgds Peter