public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Webb <purslow@ca.inter.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo list stats?
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:58:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903165823.GA4871@ca.inter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0909030859k4b2416acr1bc036fbda6b5b9@mail.gmail.com>

090903 Mark Knecht wrote:
> I'm wondering whether these stats are correct?
> They are captured from  http://archives.gentoo.org/
> I find them a bit disappointing.  I was surprised
> how much email traffic has fallen off for the Gentoo lists
> over the last couple of years.  I suspect some of this
> is folks moving to less technical environments - maybe Ubuntu or Arch -
> but still I was surprised that it was something like a 60 % drop
> since the high in 2006.  I was also surprised at the drop on gentoo-dev
> as it correlates with my impression of bugs not being addressed as fast.
> 
>         gentoo-dev       gentoo-user       gentoo-amd64
> 2009     3743            11126             1519 
> 2008     5379            15269             1418 
> 2007     8480            13643             1977 
> 2006    10184            25954             4038 
> 2005     9055            15378             1880 
> 2004     8569              545               27       
> 2003     8324       
> 2002     8156       
> 2001     5679       
> 2000        4       

First, you need to adjust 2009 by 3/2 , ie

  2009     5615            16689             2279

which shows a significant increase this year in all 3 categories.

Otherwise, I agree with the other comments, ie that Gentoo has matured:
Portage is more user-friendly, big changes like Udev have been accomplished,
people who shouldn't be using Gentoo have dropped out
& the few devs who were responsible have stopped flaming one another
(or perhaps do so on a non-public list somewhere else);
it may also be true that the Forum has taken away a lot of users,
who seem on average younger (it sounds like a high-school cafeteria).

Quality is what matters & I'ld say it has improved in recent years.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___    Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-03 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-03 15:59 [gentoo-user] Gentoo list stats? Mark Knecht
2009-09-03 16:04 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-09-03 17:50   ` Mark Knecht
2009-09-03 18:27     ` Dale
2009-09-03 16:20 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-03 20:01   ` Albert Hopkins
2009-09-03 16:58 ` Philip Webb [this message]
2009-09-03 18:53 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-09-03 20:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090903165823.GA4871@ca.inter.net \
    --to=purslow@ca.inter.net \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox