From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MgPAe-0004qW-01 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:32:40 +0000 Received: by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 207) id 9A1D1E0969; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0127E0C51; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906BBE0C51 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so4437866ewy.14 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:48:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=gIgjxbJbEndrPHQLP1/JyARYOXyBzNSc53eQrv/suuU=; b=bFzcQezo89QTYjeVpFDr/hdVQL92LyUYf2Tu38uPXASn6gwKLUJ3/MkrlvsdB5JcFj 1RFoPgRId61Z8hDPR3QZmd7F7jAtNoDvZC0KRlQWeq8BA7N7JahcDBgRyKmFFPfgj9/E 9PdD8a1ixyYap75x7MhBanDU2SeT6HtQ0HlW4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=EDCV0xHJTv/BEdDgzIq+XaHQ60MXZgJ4gw/Q8rKSHM7E68+RLyMd6YeSCfzTb34kyN o83F8SK1FBMZYCATKlxKkN368C5G35Y/TgDaVj/FyMveLaES978zUtLzcdUlyIHcwIEg AH1TU7dkyEED3wbl/mZblW+d8AGnSPjCUI0UY= Received: by 10.210.112.1 with SMTP id k1mr7405544ebc.37.1251272883080; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet ([196.210.202.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm2202023eyb.12.2009.08.26.00.47.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:48:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Masked package needs itsself ? Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:46:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20090826023245.GA5818@solfire> <20090826031018.GC5818@solfire> In-Reply-To: <20090826031018.GC5818@solfire> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908260946.26624.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 95db3d15-696c-4149-8b05-30e1fb24f2ab X-Archives-Hash: d82e4a568b2614ed7d5d5ec97468cbdc On Wednesday 26 August 2009 05:10:18 meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: > > Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P > > jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this > failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to update jpeg-7 (according the output > I posted). Incorrect. Something else is pulling it in and you snipped that output. Your initial post only says that emerge wants to include jpeg and it won't emerge version 7 as it is unstable and your box is stable. It's from some package that specifically wants jpeg-7 as opposed to just jpeg. Most likely netpbm which is hardcoded to DEPEND on jpeg-7. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com