From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MgPAT-0004oz-0a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:32:31 +0000 Received: by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 207) id E550BE09AB; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DD11E0A5C; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.149]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51EBE0A5C for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 13so769495eye.40 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:23:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=y6FFg/aXvPEsIkkCk4uPhgb4m5JWsSbZMkfTYVfifbs=; b=BcFzF1jSeOISCDsC2wxhr/jnCDAzJchWd27WCzLPre6eixKQ5ep7rQ6bUjuwGSGvMz 2c1KJ+rhsd9335uogmdP1SQjW3OqBmt31Pr8D9EojZWji7OguuY2HAAMrJWeXpigM+F0 ogqBovpslzjzanu7/OzeqUzOWeqOedKE2vIUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=WPcWlT+vwevVwoF0U5klC1RcxlU/ur1leqBYZKvPbcpclKlVeK7zghdBrebq0Fgc6Z nNynH08JuasixQOY+eFKk+BtSoz5O10x5EG8NZR/kNtIz2W52Lsf4Dm2y16YPQM5McqC ufqLLomkVrKM0iMZXwIs/h0vq1JR5tjrQErog= Received: by 10.216.38.68 with SMTP id z46mr1471947wea.6.1251256983627; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.197.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm2801052gvc.10.2009.08.25.20.23.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:23:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Masked package needs itsself ? Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:22:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30.5r4; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20090826023245.GA5818@solfire> <20090826031018.GC5818@solfire> In-Reply-To: <20090826031018.GC5818@solfire> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908260522.58682.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 90e8b43f-d93d-4bc0-aa65-ce8540402300 X-Archives-Hash: c4ec5cf85faf8790e76030604c8eb96d On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: > > Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P > > jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this > failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to update jpeg-7 (according the output > I posted). > If I install it, many packaged needs to rebuild, for which I > have not the time. on my very 'full' system I had to rebuild 53 packages - including one qt package, kdelibs, xulrunner and firefox, imagemagick and other stuff, some of it minor some not. It is not that bad (masked qt-3 and kde3 was another nice thing that cost some time - well, system is qt3/kde3 free now ...) or very bad, depending on your system ;)