From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MgP9z-0003hI-Q0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:31:59 +0000 Received: by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 207) id E5FAEE044C; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C97F4E0AEB; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872ECE0AEB for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so4299400ewy.14 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:41:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=RBX8efRf+S73mzlpMXc7G4O7qtTDgPMTRgNhBgmBT2Q=; b=Y3A4XqiQ72S8jnWXzugDGYM4xFKHKpbuYt24AIvXhjiNE/kXepx3YmcSLHQ+iq2odE LxeA9NEwl27XBSsPZr6AqWGZFMppi+Qb1yk2xTe+xEpjjqNRwH+3ZJeho2rXMwQKKXvU 6QCZuc9HgbhPGj9BYxQt1T9j5dMYvG3IhiTHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=UIbhkQ4MGRzA4bZhMIpuOgcJONNcT+bgLTZOQE17HIrNfuMnCxAjlr4NioeKE0IU0h q6TXvh2nXwxusdQAa4Lr15hp6WBtlLmcnYMvYYJjKkBczBT7ANVybVxeI4Lu5pfEHBj0 6iS0GWj10Juoe3XRRhGuaQmzRkFkl8BtAB4uo= Received: by 10.216.91.10 with SMTP id g10mr1454963wef.71.1251254494809; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.197.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i34sm2809837gve.28.2009.08.25.19.41.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:41:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Masked package needs itsself ? Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:41:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30.5r4; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20090826023245.GA5818@solfire> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908260441.30348.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 2b8ae76a-93a8-47b5-98be-3b6db1eaf4e2 X-Archives-Hash: 0f03509d1f7a64c44395bc5154f86ad1 On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 08/26/2009 05:32 AM, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while trying to update my gentoo I got this: > > > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=media-libs/jpeg-7" have been > > masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete > > your request: - media-libs/jpeg-7 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) > > > > > > I read this as jpeg-7 needs jpeg-7 to update itsself and cannot cause > > it is masked. > > I dont like to update to jpeg-7 since this package is used in so many > > othe rprograms and it is masked. > > Don't mask it. Install it, but also install media-libs/jpeg-compat > alongside it so packages won't break. or don't install jpeg-compat and be ready for a loooong revdep-rebuilt session ;)