* [gentoo-user] dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1
@ 2009-08-19 18:13 Yiannis
2009-08-19 18:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yiannis @ 2009-08-19 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Hello,
Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted on
my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running python-upgrade
twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3
are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On the other hand emege
--depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3 can be removed and this is
what I would like to do if possible. Shouldn't python-upgrade have
resolved this linking issue? From the afore mentioned ebuilds I can
tell that there is no specific dependency on python 2.5. Any help would
be appreciated.
Regards
Yiannis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1
2009-08-19 18:13 [gentoo-user] dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1 Yiannis
@ 2009-08-19 18:30 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 18:41 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 20:17 ` Yiannis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2009-08-19 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 08/19/2009 09:13 PM, Yiannis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted on
> my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running python-upgrade
> twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3
> are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On the other hand emege
> --depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3 can be removed and this is
> what I would like to do if possible. Shouldn't python-upgrade have
> resolved this linking issue? From the afore mentioned ebuilds I can
> tell that there is no specific dependency on python 2.5. Any help would
> be appreciated.
That's what revdep-rebuild is for. After depclean removes python-2.5,
you need to do a revdep-rebuild which will take care of boost and any
other packages still using the old libpython.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1
2009-08-19 18:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2009-08-19 18:41 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 20:17 ` Yiannis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yiannis @ 2009-08-19 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:30:56 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> On 08/19/2009 09:13 PM, Yiannis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted on
> > my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running
> > python-upgrade twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and
> > x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On
> > the other hand emege --depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3
> > can be removed and this is what I would like to do if possible.
> > Shouldn't python-upgrade have resolved this linking issue? From the
> > afore mentioned ebuilds I can tell that there is no specific
> > dependency on python 2.5. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> That's what revdep-rebuild is for. After depclean removes
> python-2.5, you need to do a revdep-rebuild which will take care of
> boost and any other packages still using the old libpython.
>
Ah, I thought that those ebuilds would use the latest available python.
I'll try that and report the result.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1
2009-08-19 18:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 18:41 ` Yiannis
@ 2009-08-19 20:17 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 20:32 ` Nikos Chantziaras
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yiannis @ 2009-08-19 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:30:56 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> On 08/19/2009 09:13 PM, Yiannis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted on
> > my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running
> > python-upgrade twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and
> > x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On
> > the other hand emege --depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3
> > can be removed and this is what I would like to do if possible.
> > Shouldn't python-upgrade have resolved this linking issue? From the
> > afore mentioned ebuilds I can tell that there is no specific
> > dependency on python 2.5. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> That's what revdep-rebuild is for. After depclean removes
> python-2.5, you need to do a revdep-rebuild which will take care of
> boost and any other packages still using the old libpython.
>
I am a little confused here about what happened. After removing
python-2.5.4-r3, # revdep-rebuilt -pv --library libpython2.5.so.1.0 did
not rebuild dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 nor
x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3. Also running:
# for file in `equery files vte`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file |
grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
# for file in `equery files boost`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file
| grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
returns nothing about python(I suppose that revdep-rebuild does
something like this). Everything seems ok. Am I missing something here?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1
2009-08-19 20:17 ` Yiannis
@ 2009-08-19 20:32 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 21:12 ` Yiannis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2009-08-19 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 08/19/2009 11:17 PM, Yiannis wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:30:56 +0300
> Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
>
>> On 08/19/2009 09:13 PM, Yiannis wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted on
>>> my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running
>>> python-upgrade twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and
>>> x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On
>>> the other hand emege --depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3
>>> can be removed and this is what I would like to do if possible.
>>> Shouldn't python-upgrade have resolved this linking issue? From the
>>> afore mentioned ebuilds I can tell that there is no specific
>>> dependency on python 2.5. Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> That's what revdep-rebuild is for. After depclean removes
>> python-2.5, you need to do a revdep-rebuild which will take care of
>> boost and any other packages still using the old libpython.
>
> I am a little confused here about what happened. After removing
> python-2.5.4-r3, # revdep-rebuilt -pv --library libpython2.5.so.1.0 did
> not rebuild dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 nor
> x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3. Also running:
> # for file in `equery files vte`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file |
> grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
> # for file in `equery files boost`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file
> | grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
> returns nothing about python(I suppose that revdep-rebuild does
> something like this). Everything seems ok. Am I missing something here?
What about just "revdep-rebuild -a" without any other options?
Also, what portage version do you have? If it's 2.2, it should have the
new "preserved-rebuild" feature which keeps libs even if you depclean.
If yes, I can't really help, I'm on portage 2.1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1
2009-08-19 20:32 ` Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2009-08-19 21:12 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 22:50 ` pk
2009-08-20 19:06 ` Roger Cahn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yiannis @ 2009-08-19 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:32:53 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> On 08/19/2009 11:17 PM, Yiannis wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:30:56 +0300
> > Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/19/2009 09:13 PM, Yiannis wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted
> >>> on my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running
> >>> python-upgrade twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and
> >>> x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On
> >>> the other hand emege --depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3
> >>> can be removed and this is what I would like to do if possible.
> >>> Shouldn't python-upgrade have resolved this linking issue? From
> >>> the afore mentioned ebuilds I can tell that there is no specific
> >>> dependency on python 2.5. Any help would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> That's what revdep-rebuild is for. After depclean removes
> >> python-2.5, you need to do a revdep-rebuild which will take care of
> >> boost and any other packages still using the old libpython.
> >
> > I am a little confused here about what happened. After removing
> > python-2.5.4-r3, # revdep-rebuilt -pv --library libpython2.5.so.1.0
> > did not rebuild dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 nor
> > x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3. Also running:
> > # for file in `equery files vte`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd
> > $file | grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
> > # for file in `equery files boost`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd
> > $file | grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
> > returns nothing about python(I suppose that revdep-rebuild does
> > something like this). Everything seems ok. Am I missing something
> > here?
>
> What about just "revdep-rebuild -a" without any other options?
>
> Also, what portage version do you have? If it's 2.2, it should have
> the new "preserved-rebuild" feature which keeps libs even if you
> depclean. If yes, I can't really help, I'm on portage 2.1.
>
I have portage 2.1.6.13. -a does not apply on this version of
revdep-rebuild. Do not bother anymore. As long as revdep-rebuild says
that everything is consistent I'll count on it. It was just plain
curiosity based on the different reports between python-upgrade and
revdep-rebuild(could it be a python-upgrade's bug? Does gentoo have
bugs!?!?!? :).
Anyway, thanks for helping.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-21 10:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-19 18:13 [gentoo-user] dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1 Yiannis
2009-08-19 18:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 18:41 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 20:17 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 20:32 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 21:12 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 22:50 ` pk
2009-08-20 19:06 ` Roger Cahn
2009-08-20 23:07 ` Yiannis
2009-08-21 10:21 ` Roger Cahn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox