From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbsB6-0000wf-DC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:30:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4D4AE0510; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com (mail-ew0-f210.google.com [209.85.219.210]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D67E0510 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so1473769ewy.34 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:30:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=23gVNYzCZFRrD9adiTyAcghDAonD7ikkf/6q72FAeIY=; b=ah8Kznf5r81cTK5iT0CGr3BB74MFZHmLtIUcttXDrU4Eznyt132/9c1153rKrgFWuw Ux4uB+dXc0+rQ1eJTLscHKcT0pBcgsHb97vEOj4JtOTdoHqo8NYMpIZHiIS4N0dAbVR6 GA28zOQcx881ECHpp9q3R1RxmEYEvI95HVP7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=WLiH/MfmdPOp7/ANQxN2WjmYu+2p5POfGKl5GlAjekA3S5IJwtWNS/u8A/5vZB2+Fi brm0Mbfv2X5VQYfYLbXRI1NcIwQhEB+TBJ62sgBMMYFEb/yxx2jPvj8NC7gb3Trrr8tW amExAqzYcA5R/3dn5Q1DWvppcZdNv6BDVCqJo= Received: by 10.216.53.197 with SMTP id g47mr352670wec.91.1250238615935; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.197.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p37sm2702787gvf.27.2009.08.14.01.30.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:30:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] fast recursive local copy Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:30:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30.4r4; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20090814024724.GA6759@solfire> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908141030.12001.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: eaf2b94b-3fd5-4d93-94b7-48e12bf382e0 X-Archives-Hash: fd5d588d7f30306b6b56b9fbd7debefc On Freitag 14 August 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 08/14/2009 05:47 AM, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for a faster way to do a > > > > cp -a r > > > > locally on one machine with one harddisk inside. > > > > Is there a neat trick to accomplish this faster than > > good old cp? > > Nope. Some people like to use pipes in hope to speed it up, something > like: > > tar -c | tar -xC > > but this isn't really faster and fscks up sparse files. > > But if already contains some files from , then rsync > would be faster than cp. If not, stick with cp. use cp with -u and files already existing are skipped.