From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbMeb-0002qV-5F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:50:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E52FBE05C7; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDD0E05C7 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E49DEBC9 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:50:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mm412jqMfzsi for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:49:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.ethnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C22BDEBC8 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:50:46 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Starting a daemon automatically without rc-update Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:50:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <49bf44f10908121440o3764f861r6dfddcc4c4ce91c@mail.gmail.com> <20090812230258.4f31b6b9@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090812230258.4f31b6b9@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908122350.06042.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: d0f9e302-1077-4729-8d1a-34a6957fbbdf X-Archives-Hash: ed577b61e05dbe0c2a6f264cc495dd0e On Wednesday 12 August 2009 23:02:58 Neil Bothwick wrote: > C: (n.) the language following A and B. The world still awaits D and > =C2=A0 =C2=A0E. By Z, it may be acceptable for general use. I sympathise with that. Nearly 30 years ago I found it easier to write in=20 assembler than C. Nowadays I don't program any more - I leave it to the=20 young whipper-snappers and complain when they get it wrong. [/OT - sorry] =2D-=20 Rgds Peter