From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZMX2-00064e-1w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:18:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09A71E030D; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2846E030D for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so386560fgg.14 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=5qobeYJAfJSB3Gpsr1rEFLcI+cQqkmKgd7LQj8jM3ag=; b=IH90uYTen5m1AW82ItvJKn7uIeJqw2+7bUu2/cdpBJL8KhI8VJYCSWz4tN20uGJ9fq edirncYuAsLwDpj3HUs9wzKr7+WmMb2FJn0dEbN1dkV1ETqzVj91APuu4ISSZk+hRez6 LghBWQguIjSI5lB/ENJ+P3IiM1Tmz5gLNngtM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=YQL/DID5TemukTh5dSyFE4VfxJtu4vBSj7fze6hgHMD4I8YF1UDG2E+rUBv88AG4X9 hl6gtDZkZ3RmRIjRrCUiz3ZXi33+5IYPaJaNvkCxbWdzUzNZz4EvfoJhiDfwUF7jCxwt gT2Rdwhm2+vSH1MfW4JR0KrYG0lJLVRrqIKWQ= Received: by 10.86.50.4 with SMTP id x4mr720988fgx.76.1249640318209; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (dustpuppy.is.co.za [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm2962057fgb.12.2009.08.07.03.18.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:18:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Weird slocate behaviour - file ignored? Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:17:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <6AF8CEA7-7B7D-4B6A-818F-7DD7410013D3@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <617BA82A-0E5E-4489-A4E5-1475B9CC258E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <4A7BF46A.8090509@coolmail.se> In-Reply-To: <4A7BF46A.8090509@coolmail.se> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908071217.15885.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 5cedbb87-af12-4938-90d2-dc37fced21ad X-Archives-Hash: fe6a50c679200205fa05e4d2b8037696 On Friday 07 August 2009 11:31:22 pk wrote: > Stroller wrote: > > I'm seeing on a SECOND machine exactly the same thing - files larger > > than about 4gb are not showing up in the locate search results: > > > > $ ls -lh File.big > > -rw-r--r-- 1 stroller users 5.4G 2009-02-27 10:31 File.big > > $ sudo updatedb -v > foo > > Password: > > $ grep File.big foo > > /home/stroller/File.big > > $ locate File.big > > $ > > I get the same behaviour as you: > # updatedb -v | grep -i file.big > /home/pk/file.big > # locate file.big > # As posted previously, mine works fine :-) My box is 64 bit. Strolelr and Peter, are yours 32 or 64 bit? -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com