From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKk3z-0008S5-Qi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:24:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41053E059B; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anli.goldspace.net (anli.goldspace.net [80.246.67.229]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5A9E059B for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anli.goldspace.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anli.goldspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818AD5A650 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:24:11 +0400 (MSD) Content-Disposition: inline From: Andrew Gaydenko To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: qt3support conflict Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:24:11 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906280624.11286.a@gaydenko.com> X-Archives-Salt: 592946f9-7afc-4744-8ea0-7633a3a36744 X-Archives-Hash: 4ce12a6bcff7cb5c456f3373ac1e866e On Sunday 28 June 2009 02:54:59 walt wrote: > On 06/27/2009 03:32 PM, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > make.conf hasn't qt3support at all. Adding qt3support to qt-opengl > > shows... well... something horrible (see below) :-) > > > > //====================================================================== > > emerge -pvDuN world > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies... done! > > [ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2 [4.5.1] USE="glib iconv qt3support > > ssl -debug -doc -pch" 0 kB [ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2 [4.5.1] > > USE="iconv -debug -pch" 0 kB [blocks b ] > (" > I recently went through the same thing on ~amd64 and emerge made me > uninstall every qt package before it would start building the updates. I > have no idea why, but everything finally came out okay. > > I'd say go ahead and emerge -C all of those qt blockers as emerge suggests. Walt, thanks! At my case portage has ovecome those blocks without direct unmerging.