From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKhMS-0001vB-Nw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:31:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D0D1E05E8; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F211E05E8 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so3934729ewy.34 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:31:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=gvqdNUSKaWrT+6ZDxU8Ne91mVQk875MZa2rnpP/Qk2M=; b=MFvzj22o8VlG9XLC3HQLOzgEXq+jPGiQFStIe8mOCjr41gEccVnkp5VGBw+HO0HYuN c+LrHiaJSWuNaV7U4gUv5p2c8iUbOL/m20k0Ekf6krMrInCngn3VpUCOQ5Xk4+AAalMi g/7UJocrAgCJjZ/M7pEk+1EJEHaVIFfTOQPiI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=BGCxNOGNVdRktWMmmzZ7ctbuTMHicQjSg09awa8YprIAf2PTr9AhMN9KHHicmrfttw V1OSZMIJDn7far9TVzZ8gR9dVuqgk02Mkx/UJUS/WwcWo/Vu76ql8pm83TLyX3ibsXju b/bJWdKmvpDi/x2Y+UiRLpBrH2YfhDepqb0bs= Received: by 10.210.76.4 with SMTP id y4mr6120538eba.61.1246145466626; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.197.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm8486250ewy.39.2009.06.27.16.31.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:31:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] coexisting GCC versions Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:31:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.90 (Linux/2.6.30r4; KDE/4.3.60; x86_64; ; ) References: <200906280124.45289.wonko@wonkology.org> In-Reply-To: <200906280124.45289.wonko@wonkology.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906280131.04307.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: d53e7c88-59a7-4bdd-a582-5e6dd161e586 X-Archives-Hash: 25ad727a86d33f5d6851c3d72d4f1ac0 On Sonntag 28 Juni 2009, Alex Schuster wrote: > Roger Mason writes: > > I need gcc 4.3 to compile a specific application. I am hoping that I > > can install gcc 4.3 alongside 4.1.1 without suffering some awful > > catastrophe. This is the output of emerge on the machine in question: > > [...] > > > Can someone confirm that I'll be able to use gcc 4.3 for the specific > > application that needs it but then revert to 4.1.1 without having to > > re-compile all or most of my system? > > I'm pretty sure you can. Emerge gcc 4.3, activate it with gcc-config, > compile your application, and use gcc-config again to revert back to 4.1 if > you like. > > Or keep 4.3 as default, I don't think you could run into problems. > > Wonko he will over time. If you switch default compiler emerge -s world has to be done. But seriously, why staying with 4.1? it's old... and 4.3 was a nice release...