From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKUES-0001qF-1h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:30:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 134DBE04B9; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6E9E04B9 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so3630487ewy.34 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=eBNWzeSXmnuBqkgzih+lECESfxiYXlT6nOyU55ffpkk=; b=dyhO+Fi7yBAqRRh6tGISr71oKKqHhSdLrPuS9UiFjCt4NWgfLojugZa1+pNvECYP2x qR4muKgkRwZQUZzCoTj9EXcPYZzZ39Z/ksuTC23119TC1FoAeEPMYI3kS/J7mXCImgtm J4cEoDDDDCOeJR4hZg1IL67wGocqRW1SGHSgA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=PExx7XGVRWYnifRbF43M8CaYHgwTGPDW00enIYLKhCPpMlAVtciKg6QEsRz5/vdsKW Y+XbS+aos1QvrDifNlkjZ/83cINEgV/C1yVymhL6xyWGSmSYQWyEyHwavnmVBPGs5MaZ laviRbMdIzDVTD004KjJP0++AnGm2muYqcwoE= Received: by 10.211.180.19 with SMTP id h19mr1101049ebp.93.1246094998256; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet ([196.210.202.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm2274203eyz.11.2009.06.27.02.29.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:29:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mesa build failure Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:28:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <5bdc1c8b0906260816w2e028a7v8759a4d3e3a48504@mail.gmail.com> <200906262130.09503.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0906261302q688fa2f3h23cf623d98f6cca4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0906261302q688fa2f3h23cf623d98f6cca4@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906271128.17548.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: fe6f1fce-a640-4f42-bd04-ffef55f765b9 X-Archives-Hash: d2ca01628afb66b364b618f615718e96 On Friday 26 June 2009 22:02:54 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Friday 26 June 2009 21:05:01 Mark Knecht wrote: > >> So the weirdness continues. mesa built but then xorg-server failed > >> with the same failure: > >> > >> > >> * >>> SetUID: [chmod go-r] /usr/bin/Xorg ... > >> [ ok ] > >> > >> Switching to xorg-x11 OpenGL interface...ln: creating symbolic link > >> `./libglx.so': File exists > >> !!! Error: Failed to create /lib/libglx.so > > > > Looks like you have a file collision between xorg-server and mesa, which > > is odd as those packages get a lot of testing. > > > > Anything on bugs.gentoo.org? > > I haven't looked there yet but I will. > > I'm on a mission here. For this machine I want emerge -e @system to > install NOTHING having to do with X11. After I get to that point, > depclean'ed, revdep'ed, eix-test-obsoleted, then I'm going back to > installing X from scratch. I've just gotten past the emerge -e @system > part now. > > I'm sort of surprised the openssh shows up as part of @system, or it's > getting pulled in somehow, and its default flags are dragging in X. USE="X" pulls in x11-apps/xauth so you likely want to disable that flag. > > Sort of anal I suppose but these machine have been neglected for the > last couple of years being stuck with old drivers & old kernels. If > I'm going to try and get the newest ati-drivers working I feel like I > sort of owe it to those developers (and myself) to have as few issues > hanging out as possible. Look at it this way: the only known factor that leads to easy-maintainable and sane systems for all is analness coming from the top :-) -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com