From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MImcZ-0004SW-PF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:43:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25B59E0355; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA631E0355 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rohan.altum.de (p5DC81B91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.200.27.145]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKv1o-1MImcW3pwG-000jlm; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:43:49 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FF1700092 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:43:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gondolin.localnet (gondolin.altum.de [192.168.1.4]) (Authenticated sender: heini) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89BF270008B for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:43:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Dirk Heinrichs Organization: Privat To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lvm problem -- is timing? Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:43:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) References: <4A3EB163.3060701@leehouse.eclipse.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906221843.44786.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/kpUFC3Vg2TPvTgsccUO98B9kjwi+cMYYMhPe gAuuCdZT1N4CJ6yZbX2tH78wJ4xHufijwoxhbVJgX3i3tKFQC/ VQ0+0UqwASlYfh9qGzIrg== X-Archives-Salt: da4248e1-0925-4801-a65e-2a75f4fc9380 X-Archives-Hash: e12e896cc136015229d28a07c32805ac Am Montag 22 Juni 2009 03:20:02 schrieb Maxim Wexler: > > Would I be correct in thinking the SSD is a sata device while the SD is > > a usb device?? > > > > How are you USB drivers compiled in the kenrnel? And what about: > # NOTE: USB_STORAGE depends on SCSI but BLK_DEV_SD may also be needed; > # see USB_STORAGE Help for more information > CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=y Are CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD and CONFIG_SCSI also compiled in? Bye... Dirk