From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MI7H0-0004hG-V3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:34:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6366E0388; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.9]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BA4E0388 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rohan.altum.de (p5DC80C4B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.200.12.75]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKsym-1MI7Gy3pUI-000dsq; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:34:49 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FD4700092 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:34:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gondolin.localnet (gondolin.altum.de [192.168.1.4]) (Authenticated sender: heini) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D491E70008B for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:34:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Dirk Heinrichs Organization: Privat To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lvm problem -- is timing? Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:34:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) References: <200906202226.31608.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> In-Reply-To: <200906202226.31608.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4143690.nGkxF2spQa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906202234.45253.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19EEbUKveAwZ02KCEVNZW24JyCSrbylgpCqYgn Kt176nbWJct73auVgI6D+hTbLtLQ9ctztZnaFCfCa443/fRbSH LGcmZJeZ/26P8aPJJQcsA== X-Archives-Salt: cabae1a9-49dc-440e-b61e-8e447ea84a2d X-Archives-Hash: b8b665910da18588b3079b9c931c91ec --nextPart4143690.nGkxF2spQa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Samstag 20 Juni 2009 22:26:31 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs: > Am Samstag 20 Juni 2009 21:23:29 schrieb Maxim Wexler: > > > As said above, it's not not needed. Maybe it's better to investigate > > > wether there are any leftovers from baselayout 1 in the runlevels. Th= is > > > was at > > > > How? > > You could start by comparing the contents of the bl2 and openrc packages > with what you really have the directories they install their files into. You could also look into /usr/share/openrc/runlevels/, which shows the defa= ult=20 state of /etc/runlevels. Bye... Dirk --nextPart4143690.nGkxF2spQa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBKPUfl8NVtnsLkZ7sRAgFuAJ93LpsLVSTKEDcJm3PSIwqYRj9BGACgpd1v +y3yf4LBSsXHBUzJUauhhz8= =HzVG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4143690.nGkxF2spQa--