From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHy7H-0008BP-Ab for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:48:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9511DE01C7; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A85E01C7 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C14AB32E72E for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:48:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:48:03 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How to nail the order of modules loaded Message-ID: <20090620114803.391706a2@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200906201106.19482.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> References: <1245481611.436368@rumba> <200906200925.49727.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <20090620090637.696800a5@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <200906201106.19482.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1cvs76 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/VFbMmtHXPUzcref+bKwF621"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: aa4a44c6-a3e8-426d-8609-7229e88e6fc3 X-Archives-Hash: 83b7acab97756cfa92da5f339738ec8b --Sig_/VFbMmtHXPUzcref+bKwF621 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:06:19 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > I thought that,but reading the question again, I don't think the > > problem is naming, but the wrong driver claiming the card. =20 >=20 > Naming makes the order irrelevant. True, but, depending on how you interpret the original question, it cold also mean that the wrong driver claiming the card means the interface doesn't come up. It all depends on how you interpret "this doesn't work", which isn't the most useful of descriptions. If it is simply a naming problem, then udev persistent names are the best solution, but I'm not sure that's the problem. Perhaps the OP could clarify what is going wrong. --=20 Neil Bothwick After a few years in space, even Worf started to look good... --Sig_/VFbMmtHXPUzcref+bKwF621 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAko8vmcACgkQum4al0N1GQMARACfb/BZKcIGJ5TY/Tk5eQZ58U+w XWcAnA0cz7bFvsStkgZphuTHtM6T0Jeu =iXyC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VFbMmtHXPUzcref+bKwF621--