From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGTXO-00041V-FQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:56:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF7BAE0111; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (mail-ew0-f224.google.com [209.85.219.224]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C499E0111 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so531747ewy.34 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:56:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=2lOjQGpVTTRpWzKceBUPIslQTJ0Ijii74nzDcIFeA8c=; b=gMpMjGSvy77n1gn/ZXVJRIqeARniP9UzRt4RoxKZwxEaTkMDUeyKypXX3EOmG4eOl9 moP8GvdljJniH786QDfsMnWOIE4wfSdP84UvguDoXMBLDRkQvciXS7jiDKtmxcToiNvH cqotXXBWRAfLr48XhLcAqI5Q2HxysnVId8yc4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=Ozm81e5YNCFZLlp7miMBrLO36S2kMtaOr+hEg2XR/5NOVhq8BwOj2HuQJFxwiDUzME YxjX7AkMRElrxDPusQOS/K/ybBe3N4EnxIAB9QhJ6hm2tdMDoV1OSs4llotvCD4BHnaS QJhvOAR1UxVRbHvTIfsqVh028SwAlYpBGCi2E= Received: by 10.210.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr9321276eba.78.1245139010884; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-153-123-rrdg-esr-2.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.153.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm1022342eyz.1.2009.06.16.00.56.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:56:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lvm problem(s) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:55:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <200906151906.01800.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906160955.16767.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 5cbe8455-b846-4a98-b25d-e1b8e37e3f6c X-Archives-Hash: faa5d267995f12f9aec0f887ee3a8246 On Tuesday 16 June 2009 02:33:22 Maxim Wexler wrote: > > With baselayout2 and openrc, you need to explicitly put lvm into the boot > > Wow! I didn't even realize lvm was in init.d. There's nothing in the > doc about it. So I went ahead and added to the boot-level and > rebooted. > > Same as before with (looks like) one addition: > ... > *The lvm init-script is written for baselayout-2! > [!!] > *Please do not use it with baselayout-1! > > So I removed lvm from boot level and just did a static /etc/init.d/lvm > start and got the exact msg as above. > > ... > > How did I only get baselayout-1? I used the latest tarballs. And what > init-script should I use? > > FWIW only one device, the SD card, can't be found and it is listed > about 20 times in the boot console before the LVM gives up. > > Hold on, here's /etc/conf.d/lvm: > > #LVM should normally only be started after mdraid is available > #this is because LVM physical volumes are very often MD devices > RC_AFTER="mdraid" > > #vim: ft=gentoo-conf-d > > Well, I don't have mdraid, as far as I know. I'll just comment out > that line and see where it leads. Here's something to check: By the time lvm wants to start during boot on that machine, is the SD card actually available yet? It needs drivers and such to be loaded and initialized first. dmesg should list if that step has been completed first. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com