From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MFSNN-0001X9-6O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:30:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FD88E0414; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B277E0414 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74A152FD76F for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:30:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:30:06 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] conflict in fstab w/ lvm? Message-ID: <20090613133006.795d6682@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <342e1090906121847k565e9454he9394f7a22734068@mail.gmail.com> References: <342e1090906121254u1214c065xb323c22a2f2e3040@mail.gmail.com> <342e1090906121847k565e9454he9394f7a22734068@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1cvs74 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Yvq_iniA7inBpyix5DIFcAu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: f32eee01-46c6-4d43-9eb8-a965c1599c0b X-Archives-Hash: f08c178de0a8c98b38f8eeab6a251467 --Sig_/Yvq_iniA7inBpyix5DIFcAu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:47:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote: > You have only two choices, being an eee user myself, and having it > upgraded to 2GB RAM, I choose the tempfs filesystem for /tmp (RAM) > instead of keeping temporary files writen and deleted from my poor > SSD. If you have low RAM, you can decide to leave it on the SSD and > thus give more room for app data on RAM. I use tmpfs for /tmp with a 1GB Eee, /tmp usage is usually small, less than a MB. PORTAGE_TMPDIR, on the other hand getslots of writes, so I have than on a cheap, replaceable SD card. --=20 Neil Bothwick Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is 100%. --Sig_/Yvq_iniA7inBpyix5DIFcAu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkozm9MACgkQum4al0N1GQPuaACeNVUGiL1OqwJ+v4m4Qmsn4D4q CU4Ani9IdQrs3TrmqdM+yWrRA68fcbNf =6ysp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Yvq_iniA7inBpyix5DIFcAu--