From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEnli-0003yO-CM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:08:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82248E04C9; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46178E04C9 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so138805fxm.34 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=TZ6GUYO91ffor2AhHEfQaN2nYPHWvFkqWk63BXI7V0Q=; b=oatRuFOUsylI4yMaKEpO+TEvYkQfLJUVOhO0MyvvLKqYnB3HpGfFqrUh2X4AO45BEZ HgcuGq+/nGQE89tfzWB3UwPb0pMKMSQJ8lgN3ShfqMCr28LL98PtLZgEGHrpIYj//RY6 zZu2rvmfQ0phyYrJ/GQZAWHp26zo23CZsVfZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=W8FaWXPFAbnXAzfFAquOI6QHfFPvd2FG/dWrsaO9X8XrfqZacAKHUOg8uFo0B/Jyfs 0cHr8gQpsnnzX8iLxUsbky3TXbzvHZYFXyVJ9IXiNhpMBOsOrTnBWmUKQ9/U8nnwQM4k GDnp5A979JHsCnM16z1QOwrTLSbbEXfC/nMXY= Received: by 10.103.176.20 with SMTP id d20mr1425334mup.27.1244740127696; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coercion ([91.191.238.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm227109muh.57.2009.06.11.10.08.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:06:12 +0600 From: Mike Kazantsev To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can I exclude a package from --depclean's consideration? Message-ID: <20090611230612.01f9f6f1@coercion> In-Reply-To: References: <58965d8a0906110922u39145b35w8850b1a2767c4b43@mail.gmail.com> <20090611224525.4467a4e9@coercion> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/CkAxa17VAF3/bPySEsMkTbf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a0aa4391-a462-4cb1-822e-c4acb2a5b1c0 X-Archives-Hash: b53da0dd4ec47174716cc99d7691c032 --Sig_/CkAxa17VAF3/bPySEsMkTbf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:03:31 +0200 Boris Fersing wrote: > did you read the first lines of this file ? >=20 > # WARNING: default set configuration, DO NOT CHANGE. > # If you want to change anything redefine the relevant section in > # /etc/portage/sets.conf. Any changes to this file will be lost on the ne= xt > # portage update, and configuration errors here might upset portage in > # unexpected ways. Guess it's some kind of mind-habit of avoiding uppercase text in the head of important configuration files, sorry. --=20 Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net --Sig_/CkAxa17VAF3/bPySEsMkTbf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoxOYgACgkQASbOZpzyXnFSEwCeO6tBNtvcn6sZdGFLMbMtGjdU eTAAoOzoX5eHBTZ9e6xukvH7BjUj1Tl9 =oblH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/CkAxa17VAF3/bPySEsMkTbf--