From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-96557-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1MEetX-0008J9-Lv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:40:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB605E02F0; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08BCE02F0 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11700417A96 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:40:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:40:11 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure Message-ID: <20090611084011.07ea1dde@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <uski7tl7i.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <u63f4ui36.fsf@newsguy.com> <87my8foot7.fsf@galiza_ceive.gnu-linux.org> <uws7jua9d.fsf@newsguy.com> <58965d8a0906101315j3e3b5557x87b621400a2a889c@mail.gmail.com> <uski7tl7i.fsf@newsguy.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1cvs71 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/yoFVhaCNmFmwIkgA/PWUc8U"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0b72eee8-75ce-4310-97d4-2ea0551c0076 X-Archives-Hash: 040b763b7d90e104edbf7f259ef07ec1 --Sig_/yoFVhaCNmFmwIkgA/PWUc8U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:04:33 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > > man ebuild > I see no hits at all on either `overlay' or `layman' in man ebuild. > There must be more to the story than just running ebuild commands. And > expect the modified ebuild to be accepted by emerge. That's because the instruction should have been man 5 ebuild. You're looking at the man page for the ebuild command. --=20 Neil Bothwick Why is the word abbreviation so long? --Sig_/yoFVhaCNmFmwIkgA/PWUc8U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkowtOAACgkQum4al0N1GQNxawCghGlJW0KmJwwHM1UAts7oiDVz 13gAn1LOKnTbSORG/+LEtstTrsWvlEQV =+qEQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/yoFVhaCNmFmwIkgA/PWUc8U--