From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MDeLo-0001c3-E8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:53:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56E85E0329; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1D3E0329 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EBEB28B9AA for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:53:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:53:12 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can fix preserved-rebuild ... Message-ID: <20090608135312.3b7b922f@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1244463957.15834.58.camel@rattus> References: <1244289806.15834.22.camel@rattus> <200906061923.13739.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <1244338101.15834.31.camel@rattus> <20090607171127.30ba5793@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <1244463957.15834.58.camel@rattus> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1cvs71 (GTK+ 2.16.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ij1=ZZKmYllVI=3+jG8qxn/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 5fb2bd47-d5fd-43dc-9d5f-9b392dd25fe8 X-Archives-Hash: cc50cceb9ad43361fd38328e45646d47 --Sig_/ij1=ZZKmYllVI=3+jG8qxn/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:25:57 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: > On this system, I just left portage at what seemed to be a working > version to avoid the problems caused by the downgrade. I think the key word here is "seemed" :( --=20 Neil Bothwick There's no place like ~ --Sig_/ij1=ZZKmYllVI=3+jG8qxn/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkotCbwACgkQum4al0N1GQPiiQCfaa4TbrKPabsiKlPRTRKvup5g eg4An12FgaQHmmUNUsVBlBBXRhBNq90O =E/H8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ij1=ZZKmYllVI=3+jG8qxn/--