From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCA9C-0002bz-1X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:26:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1C67E0320; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com [209.85.219.213]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9650AE0320 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so889278ewy.34 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:26:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=2+AZlnAkHvQT6dt4X5KOs4ypSnvnLPbtFINPBT0uqZM=; b=JiPWDgKuDVCnHUaL6NXTaxA5s5S0FpeQK7Na0v+FnzcEjBjhF0TMEKUSLGnmiM/jXd XGHhDZy7C87sWWPcbdlNv6l3xRLyztD1J2w4I0jskX7n93Zmz/32xkNOZfcxKYcDV/qm tTChav2AN9PSfJBS+0kgrRmke5S3M8VSPw0Mg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=H7P4X9MBYSd4go4nkxgDnu45lICld5IATUIdmGegmRHs29lTyvWdcyxA14OVBsf4pt uFwZoKM0bSO1k1FMAWSunH1bFcsmFEAuT/KIPTA5xh9dZczaoKADQiC/Dl9NwL6cXD2P u/GX6//6BijDJNZueGIq1ql2v1wgfABkU9c34= Received: by 10.210.43.10 with SMTP id q10mr1482718ebq.70.1244111168014; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.197.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1800662ewy.76.2009.06.04.03.26.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:26:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.29-r5 & ext4 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:26:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.29.4r4; KDE/4.2.87; x86_64; ; ) References: <20090604122713.7a523392@ilievnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20090604122713.7a523392@ilievnet.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906041226.02121.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 1c40b444-94a6-4975-8c5f-f1e999b96c63 X-Archives-Hash: c60bce9507ceacfab2ca0817ec8cca34 On Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009, Daniel Iliev wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday I decided to try gentoo-sources again. I was using vanilla, > because of ext4 - when it was declared stable, gentoo-sources still was > at the ext4dev phase (a version or so behind the upstream as expected). > Yesterday, when migrating from vanilla-2.6.28 to gentoo-sources-2.6.29-5 > I haven't noticed any new FS related options except for the btrfs which > I don't need, thus have disabled. > > Kernel compiles w/o errors, but when booted it panics with error msg > like "unknown mount option ``extents''". > > Yes, I have "extents" among the following options in fstab and > they work with vannila-2.6.28 > > "/dev/md1 / ext4 stripe=2048,commit=2,extents,orlov,delalloc,\ > errors=remount-ro,nodiratime,noatime 0 1" > > Ideas, suggestions? maybe ext4 depends on 'Broken' - as it should - and so it was not shown in menuconfig. As it was not shown, you did not enable it. Without enabling it, it wasn't compiled in ....