From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBos1-0000o4-S1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:43:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 299F1E0557; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com [209.85.219.213]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCD4E0557 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so8763479ewy.34 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:42:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=hxMBsvX50wIsqCjIFDLAw+DS1bdsq8ML8xAvcQpVCqs=; b=nomzV/Rxsgzu33P+ygUgSULhMo2lEXa0WRkCiNpQYxuXMTdJseueluCjV6WvPsHsH0 z4ZEbqjdx9urI3CZmS/k3O9l4NW9qyI91gXgLm1qanieM1W7kzEacBGV6Phs+eWT+Pdo oLJlEp6Jm28n3NbK47BN02dJ7/jKH0iQu3MDE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=aKgkl23Io4h8Ctj4o6Urnwp0PBqQwM9KRqVMKcXXVO+aZRd6znrM8QHlVBq71PbLqj AnjJ3X+SwwdsInAXrU5lCtTg4XHM4/Grr7poHt7ZnwgEyQta5INCD0FzQkgiXdl4QW9u stfTi2FBb/BMVrm5SKvuwUpkzDW7yDqLkgbYA= Received: by 10.216.29.72 with SMTP id h50mr274773wea.137.1244029379277; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (dustpuppy.is.co.za [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j8sm18864409gvb.11.2009.06.03.04.42.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:42:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt-core-4.5.1 jamboree not optimised for i686 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:41:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.29-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <358eca8f0906030435s69a58d78v300464d8089f57d9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <358eca8f0906030435s69a58d78v300464d8089f57d9@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906031341.28198.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 953983f5-c1ee-49ec-a27e-c6fcd78df7e7 X-Archives-Hash: da0802625b51fb375109f426ea7f7333 On Wednesday 03 June 2009 13:35:04 Mick wrote: > Major build this morning of qt with a lot of blockers. Having > unmerged a lot of packages to remove the blockers I am now emerging > qt-core. I noticed this on my screen: > > Determining system architecture... (Linux:2.6.29-gentoo-r5:i686) > 32-bit Intel 80x86 (i386) > 'i386' is supported > System architecture: 'i386' > Symbol visibility control enabled. > Symbolic function binding enabled. > > This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition. > > Since I have these in make.conf I would think that a package like qt > would compile optimised code for my architecture, not just i386? > > ARCH="x86" > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3 -fomit-frame-pointer -msse -mmmx -pipe" > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" > CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" > CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" > > Just curious. architecture != cpu type in this case architecture is things like i386, sparc, mips, arm -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com