From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-96002-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MAXm0-0004x8-CH
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 May 2009 23:15:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BD5DE039D;
	Sat, 30 May 2009 23:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.149])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB64E039D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 30 May 2009 23:15:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 26so1206285eyw.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 30 May 2009 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=lgTXt5DlSDPH9cgziJJQiRPwcszjOGB0cz8J36THfvs=;
        b=ozoCtaIIEvUJP7hg1hBmVw8Es1tt6klgjN3aEKsV0sbZCQ5yVomXV0aCwHUllJ5V3V
         3qUr+GRKAx9kmSN12Wobd7QiRk0VsRLgj2JUdb2rdufREJWliu1sdlKZYfBJnCIP+BId
         /p1lid+RIqT+GOOI+Gu1nlRbTRzNFPfhjSPVA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        b=j8ouI/xZZjwjNN94/NNLerFcBLjA13dkABxZxiUEY8nA/f6sQTktdOT3GB6lC2UPD4
         e5JLmMwm9PKXvi00pwaFZoWQHKK46EZqmbedNApFt/zCwKyBEjGiMDdqjuIJvcEa2Qg/
         lVF51DTFbUB9DIxDf2Z7d7hNzNEKIVtb+jqtw=
Received: by 10.210.17.2 with SMTP id 2mr4411661ebq.0.1243725330316;
        Sat, 30 May 2009 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lappy.study (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm5117857eyz.11.2009.05.30.16.15.29
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 30 May 2009 16:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  Re: Disabling swap & mounting /tmp on tmpfs = new standard?
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 00:15:24 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <49bf44f10905301038v244d6209t37520ea5a956e388@mail.gmail.com> <gvrslp$5vd$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <gvrslp$5vd$1@ger.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart5347896.fWRk9nWDLY";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200905310015.43547.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 1dd8ed40-9554-471d-9a91-350827445f95
X-Archives-Hash: af67b7cd66204db51436736bdcd787aa

--nextPart5347896.fWRk9nWDLY
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 30 May 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Grant wrote:
> > I recently disabled swap and mounted /tmp on tmpfs for a netbook since
> > the SSD is so slow, and now I'm wondering if that would be a wise move
> > for all of my Gentoo systems.  In what type of situation would it be a
> > bad idea?
>
> Instead of disabling swap, just make it small (like 32MB or something;
> whatever the smallest allowable partition size is).  The kernel needs
> swap to operate optimally, even if it's extremely small.  Just make sure
> it's there.

Hmm, on this old box I noticed swap was using more than 135,000K earlier to=
day=20
as I was emerging xulrunner and ImageMagick.  I think that the size of swap=
=20
is relevant to the memory size that the box in question has.  Not all=20
machines have found their way to 2G RAM yet ... ;)

=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick

--nextPart5347896.fWRk9nWDLY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkohvh8ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLYl5gCg4xrktJz1aP3FBKTXP2Yg7cKM
0VoAoL+P3Sbo5x1vIbTDhQcYjB0I0vXJ
=Kqa5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5347896.fWRk9nWDLY--