public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eray Aslan <eray.aslan@caf.com.tr>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Tweaks for SSDs [Was: [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes]
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 22:25:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090530192529.GE5826@zptr-nb01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090530144034.525f1aba@krikkit.digimed.co.uk>

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 2009 12:06:04 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
> 
> > Delaying commits with ext4 and/or laptop-mode will reduce the wear-down
> > of your SSD but it might as well freeze your system when the actual
> > commit takes place because these things tend to have a terribly low
> > write performance.
> 
> That may explain the pauses I get from time to time. Maybe shortening the
> commit period will help.

Couple of points regarding the pauses, SSDs, schedulers and ext3/ext4:

* try ext4 with its delayed allocation. It should help with pauses
* ext3 with data=writeback should help.  Some security implications with
data=writeback tho.  So be careful if it is not a single user machine.
* Deadline scheduler has more throughput than CFQ or anticipatory but it
is totally unusable under load
* A lot of patches to ext3 and ext4 for a/m pauses and SSDs.  Some made
it to kernel 2.6.30 I believe.
* Try CFQ and NOOP as schedulers for SSDs for now.  After the above
patches, CFQ should be the better choice.

Basically, a lot of changes to ext3/ext4 and schedulers at the moment.
I would wait for at least kernel 2.6.31 before trying alternatives and
making decisions.
 
> Or I could try btrfs, which has an ssd mount option.

Ugh.  Even on-disk format is not finalized yet.

-- 
Eray



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-30 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-28 15:46 [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes Maxim Wexler
2009-05-28 16:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-28 16:16 ` Florian Philipp
2009-05-28 21:43   ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-28 22:20     ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-29  2:12   ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-05-29 17:32     ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-29 19:02       ` Dale
2009-05-29 19:56       ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-30  1:39         ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-30  4:22           ` Mike Kazantsev
2009-05-30 13:37           ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-30 10:06       ` Tweaks for SSDs [Was: [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes] Florian Philipp
2009-05-30 13:40         ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-30 19:25           ` Eray Aslan [this message]
2009-05-30 21:56             ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-03 13:50               ` Wyatt Epp
2009-06-03 21:36         ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-28 19:15 ` [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090530192529.GE5826@zptr-nb01 \
    --to=eray.aslan@caf.com.tr \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox