From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9lcN-00020V-09 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:50:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59950E0565; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com [209.85.219.213]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9DCE0565 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so5252197ewy.34 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=nTzZYQG2F1AonH5jNxmieqKkbN4rgUjfOdj1KATDgJ0=; b=jooEeaGFWHmYHpS0pdzo7sAU+PSTQI7sIw7EVKyWTZoU1+R/gLGN8amgOL08TRZp9h CFSDftoxuPDfIclrRYriTMsMv/OqqokpZgych/+r8bbZuDW4lHqcmMxBfFR7gWxDl97K ATyjg1K2KnNrH+wy3bOhr3hdr2Zw4VE78b/c8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=TL1UJ3IF7ET5aPT5jPLIOK/qenpwxp1qOtPFRuIsTwyqCURo0UIIddhTips6bxB6k9 RdHR2cdrTg6fLjL8yj5n9oe7z8WGXPPQf42Zij1DRfasTNQsTf63a4TlJj6SMJiDnc8W I7t57yusVZ8QTrgnC/Imh2C1EKBbIZLLM+HWU= Received: by 10.210.92.8 with SMTP id p8mr3242618ebb.9.1243540220438; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-153-19-rrdg-esr-2.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.153.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm814277eye.16.2009.05.28.12.50.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Running two apaches and MySQLs on the same server Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:48:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.29-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <200905281957.19368.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <200905282112.56754.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <4A1EE749.1050607@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A1EE749.1050607@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905282148.53420.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: d5f3b046-43ef-42dc-83a0-fec1de0bca39 X-Archives-Hash: b51ccf356921caa4ffb63eb6c0154202 On Thursday 28 May 2009 21:34:33 Jarry wrote: > Ad.2: he can assign 2 IPs to single NIC. No need to buy the second NIC. > > BTW, I was in a similar situation: one user wanted to use notoriously > buggy phpBB, but I did not want to risk compromising my other web-pages. > > So I have opted for #5: vserver-sources, and I have multiple instances > of apache running in pretty good isolated vserver-guests. > My =A40.0144 ... I used vserver once, and was very impressed with the performance. I didn't = use=20 it eventually, as I found administering a real running instance was non- intuitive to anyone but me and I found it very hard to get people to grok h= ow=20 to run the things. That was in the days of pre-baselayout-2 when one had to use a very hackish= =20 and buggy baselayout. How does it fare with v2? =2D-=20 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com