From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M97ke-0002d2-Eh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 May 2009 01:16:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 362F1E0352; Wed, 27 May 2009 01:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D59E0352 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 01:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E43DEBD3 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 02:16:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8R3Hmm3VYSP for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 01:16:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.ethnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE83ADEBA4 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 02:16:18 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Another USE question Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:16:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <4A1C72A5.1010905@konstantinhansen.de> <200905270052.09197.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <636AB7BF-BFA1-4ED2-933F-E62DC5550A7A@dartworks.biz> In-Reply-To: <636AB7BF-BFA1-4ED2-933F-E62DC5550A7A@dartworks.biz> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905270216.12504.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5b9c1d71-f65c-4b81-94f4-8c9b4cdab5d4 X-Archives-Hash: a8b245e363a76e87f5dc203b0122c5e3 On Wednesday 27 May 2009 01:02:17 Keith Dart wrote: > On May 26, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:33:12 Keith Dart wrote: > >> But that will likely break, or render useless, the ufed tool. > >> > >> If you don't use that, you probably should. > > > > Why? > > Makes it easy to change USE flags. You see the flag name, current > setting, and description all in one place. It also show inherited > settings. It also rewrites your USE flag. Changing USE flags is easy enough already, isn't it? I don't think I want any program meddling in my make.conf, thanks. -- Rgds Peter