From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8A3P-0003HZ-Bh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 09:31:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B370FE0387; Sun, 24 May 2009 09:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E8BE0387 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 09:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A73D2FE4D6 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 10:31:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 10:31:35 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is paludis bad for SSDs? Message-ID: <20090524103135.4f42c0a9@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <115247.85395.qm@web31607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <115247.85395.qm@web31607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1cvs64 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/k90iJyzcK9i7l8Bnfky2IFL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 810c45f1-0eb6-42a6-9c3f-5e5001006518 X-Archives-Hash: d48e6e00f1221361a8955d36e5107c7d --Sig_/k90iJyzcK9i7l8Bnfky2IFL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 May 2009 14:59:09 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote: > Thanks for the tip. Is this the sort of thing that benefits from > turning off CONFIG_PROTECT in one or more dirs?. That would mean that every update would trash your existing configs. It would be safe if you set it only when uninstalling (does Paludis have a "total removal" option) --=20 Neil Bothwick Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective with who it's friends are. --Sig_/k90iJyzcK9i7l8Bnfky2IFL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoZE/cACgkQum4al0N1GQM3gACeKi9TSNMYBnCu+5d/xcLDM/p+ QdQAoLQ5asapLPEWdCv2xUe2F+gB0vpp =zwie -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/k90iJyzcK9i7l8Bnfky2IFL--