From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1eZn-0001ZA-Rm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:42:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA9E0E03DD; Wed, 6 May 2009 10:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFB5E03DD for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 10:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99C1B4DCBC3 for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 11:42:09 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:42:03 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question... Message-ID: <20090506114203.7cb2ecf8@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4A0161EE.7090308@anferny.me.uk> References: <4A00A266.9070102@shic.co.uk> <200905052324.07892.saschahlusiak@arcor.de> <4A00AF76.9010509@shic.co.uk> <20090506062408.7b03652d@coercion> <20090506085459.5e0418c5@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <4A0161EE.7090308@anferny.me.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1cvs51 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/qSBl3FqWjy5AV_Y./avv0Fn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 27f53fd1-1600-47d4-b91e-5d59772aedd1 X-Archives-Hash: da39bbe89af3d789f39a25b6a27cc606 --Sig_/qSBl3FqWjy5AV_Y./avv0Fn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 06 May 2009 11:09:50 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote: > > If the second server is only serving HTTPS, you don't even need that. > > Just have the router forward port 80 to the first server and port 443 > > to the second. > > =20 > That leaves the HTTPS server open to the public though, which is > specifically not allowed to the OP. He can use HTTP authentication to prevent that. --=20 Neil Bothwick If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? --Sig_/qSBl3FqWjy5AV_Y./avv0Fn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoBaX8ACgkQum4al0N1GQOC3QCfcRU5qVWGSLxVRqY4G4zw4GVJ EcMAnRBVbCi1KiyN8iblD1wEOjD1L4La =zG4S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qSBl3FqWjy5AV_Y./avv0Fn--