From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:07:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905052308.09232.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905052351.07728.saschahlusiak@arcor.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1649 bytes --]
On Tuesday 05 May 2009, Sascha Hlusiak wrote:
> Am Dienstag 05 Mai 2009 23:28:22 schrieb Steve:
> > Sascha Hlusiak wrote:
> > > The easiest thing would probably be to just use ssh port forwarding
> > > because you already have all the pieces running anyway. Wouldn't a
> > > simple
> > >
> > > ssh -L 12345:secondapache:https user@remotessh
> > >
> > > and the browsing to https://localhost:12345 do the trick? Or you could
> > > use a pppd over ssh vpn, yes, but that is a bit more complex.
> > >
> > > - Sascha
> >
> > I really want to avoid having to access a non-standard port from the
> > URLs - I want to use the final URLs exactly as they will be once the
> > in-development website is eventually deployed.
> >
> > Can you recommend a 'how-to' for the pppd over ssh approach?
>
> # /usr/sbin/pppd pty "ssh root@remoteserver pppd notty local
> 10.0.0.1:10.0.0.2" noipdefault nodefaultroute noauth updetach
>
> You can also just create a file in /etc/ppp/peers/ with the following lines
> and then call 'pon':
> pty "ssh root@remoteserver pppd notty local 10.0.0.1:10.0.0.2"
> noipdefault
> nodefaultroute
> noauth
> updetach
>
> You'll get the IP 10.0.0.2 and on the server 10.0.0.1. You need to setup
> proper routing and maybe NAT for that separate subnet, but it will be a
> tunnel into your home network.
>
> - Sascha
Or even simpler solution, can't you only allow access to https from your
desired remote host IP address at your server's LAN firewall, or just use the
accept/deny wrapper of the server itself after forwarding the https port at
the firewall?
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-05 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 20:32 [gentoo-user] A networking question Steve
2009-05-05 21:23 ` Sascha Hlusiak
2009-05-05 21:28 ` Steve
2009-05-05 21:51 ` Sascha Hlusiak
2009-05-05 22:07 ` Mick [this message]
2009-05-06 0:24 ` Mike Kazantsev
2009-05-06 7:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-06 10:09 ` Anthony Metcalf
2009-05-06 10:42 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-06 12:08 ` Anthony Metcalf
2009-05-07 18:38 ` Steve
2009-05-07 22:34 ` Mick
2009-05-08 12:38 ` Steve
2009-05-08 14:43 ` Mick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905052308.09232.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox