From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LypxN-00046c-H6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:14:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9472EE0B0F; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (mail-fx0-f219.google.com [209.85.220.219]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAF1E0B0F for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so580960fxm.34 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G9Wtxcfcj0axloAit7IqHstvag46uWfwNBP+o873tdc=; b=rpV2VEb4v1bSmyI1tsdhoxA3i9RyJ02VJTIdI0U6Nw4neSOOSDUyT6Qk/fI56RVcai Br997w0Urm/MN3TK+BMDunK7QxUO1H7YnUlB1uDuWbAo3UQLLCvqQ0ocLp9QsgrMKkGp Bm8IM55E/CWV70DreSCGSniIt8Kv3t0A+E/TM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xVicvZ6gnvt+uuYNtNtVtTg3mvKMcd7Pl7BMlCPrNOuoceX4bYnl+6whdoDnyc0+Xr PtrOF6BQe8fCm2zs8wtWL/Hlsmn1Ku5MoKJn+O2/YWcYCiyFhvUOtM+e4dRxiUcFofSF +nOJJYGUoG5tag8oa0uqXRJF6ynufVtvPCM28= Received: by 10.103.160.3 with SMTP id m3mr4061648muo.25.1240935141630; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ilievnet.com ([84.21.204.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm6440957muh.58.2009.04.28.09.12.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:12:18 +0300 From: Daniel Iliev To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT:netiquete] was AUTO: Martin... Message-ID: <20090428191218.3b4ebcb9@ilievnet.com> In-Reply-To: <49F7260D.2050204@allenjb.me.uk> References: <35e5bf980904280502v6549a9d6hc5123880d3033b30@mail.gmail.com> <49F71979.2060602@konstantinhansen.de> <49F71E10.7060706@allenjb.me.uk> <20090428164347.4bf85a60@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <49F7260D.2050204@allenjb.me.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2e9fd7b1-59ec-436a-8f21-248fad393259 X-Archives-Hash: d8b2bc43fb7ca59a7427b7c312174d60 On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:51:41 +0100 AllenJB wrote: > The problem is that there's no consensus. I top post because I think > it's much more sensible. Others think otherwise. I live with it. > > It's the people who refuse to live with differences of opinion that > are the real problem. > > AllenJB > It's your choice weather to stay rfc-ignorant and "different". I shall follow the recommendations of IETF then yours. RFC 1855, Section 3.1.1: "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the original to give a context." http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 -- Best regards, Daniel