From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-94624-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Lyrej-00069R-QN
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:03:46 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F1B3E0A91;
	Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:03:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C8FE0A91
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from linux1.localdomain ([66.25.35.110])
          by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP
          id <20090428180343629.HIXV2063@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com>
          for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
          Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:03:43 +0000
Received: by linux1.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2D0E843C03; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:03:43 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:03:43 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT:netiquete] was AUTO: Martin...
Message-ID: <20090428180343.GA8275@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <OF7AAA4642.80B8B26F-ONC12575A6.003838B4-C12575A6.003838AA@retarus.de> <35e5bf980904280502v6549a9d6hc5123880d3033b30@mail.gmail.com> <49F71979.2060602@konstantinhansen.de> <49F71E10.7060706@allenjb.me.uk> <20090428164347.4bf85a60@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <49F7260D.2050204@allenjb.me.uk> <20090428191218.3b4ebcb9@ilievnet.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090428191218.3b4ebcb9@ilievnet.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-Archives-Salt: 1fa16755-da44-45ae-8262-775513536736
X-Archives-Hash: 7fa9ee6d175577811e1b6202e3b06bc7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All,

I don't normally get involved in these threads, but I want to point out
another reason for top posting.

As a blind computer user, sometimes it is more convenient to top post,
because I don't know of a way to make my screen reading software skip
over all of the quoted material.  I find it more convenient sometimes to
hear the newest material first.

William

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:51:41 +0100
> AllenJB <gentoo-lists@allenjb.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> > The problem is that there's no consensus. I top post because I think 
> > it's much more sensible. Others think otherwise. I live with it.
> > 
> > It's the people who refuse to live with differences of opinion that
> > are the real problem.
> > 
> > AllenJB
> > 
> 
> 
> It's your choice weather to stay rfc-ignorant and "different".
> I shall follow the recommendations of IETF then yours.
> 
> 
> 	RFC 1855, Section 3.1.1:
> 
> "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
> summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
> enough text of the original to give a context."
> 
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Daniel
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkn3RP8ACgkQblQW9DDEZTiMbwCglO03DGm25fY5iwxi8EO+gNuW
75oAn0vzSe7SiHNhsSVuNfrxOogPwTbC
=n40v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----