From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LwHZX-0002VU-5r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:07:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8486E054A; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82515E054A for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9080DEBE9 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lBorf9+XUVzT for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:31:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.ethnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3422DEBEA for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:20 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-180.51 on amd64 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200904211048.11721.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <49EDAC50.8000808@j-schmitz.net> In-Reply-To: <49EDAC50.8000808@j-schmitz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200904211607.11107.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9f891fdc-785c-4734-b9c7-6579355953fd X-Archives-Hash: 5354ca7f5cc1deff9bab75df4593be0a On Tuesday 21 April 2009 12:21:52 Justin wrote: > Xavier Parizet schrieb: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:57:04 +0200, Justin wrote: > >> > >> Which kernel du you use? > > > > It seems to be 2.6.29-r1 according to SYSOUT content in the portage > > output... > > Yeah that why I am asking, I had an issue with a kernel module package > which found the kernel source from the new kernel but has a SYSOUT from > the old and wanted to build against that. But sources were already > unmerged. 2.6.29-r1 is correct. (I hope I got the quoting right. Apologies if not.) -- Rgds Peter