From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvCN5-00066A-Tb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:22:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DF64E0698; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6CDE0698 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so566987mue.6 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=LkLA+8/oBss/aN2dKCmHEjRC5kAsdCGIdddCEyT4RHc=; b=jy2rmf3pn410uZNT9qZl496EUnANwTmQ/0YqYtPYw6t5buarf513ediidc3qB215y0 tXaJ1l8bM2tuPIqsCfh2zDE0bCO6vZ3E7I75YOOCJZH0vMHnnUXlvHwvAMq1RB0b5E3Q wqu9AmzdZks0HAjwXrfpmp/tAuCJIL+nlmzOk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=dvPSChNwNtuCNSJekL4S+sz7YtuAoXhg1AIQFxsZpGUFu3LLcsTwlbamnfz/HZlbB4 xUyMQWovNGbKiESeID2q+D0OeWaaMCkG8IybvVK66uGMZ7/5e1mKjXjjC9+T+39ObWEt grektcO5PqlXnuc37eM6gxM633bxxd5/TtT2A= Received: by 10.103.245.18 with SMTP id x18mr2045181mur.62.1240068141272; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-140-95-rrdg-esr-2.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.140.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm8830133muo.20.2009.04.18.08.22.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:22:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which level of flash reader for AMD64? Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:20:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.29-gentoo; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <200904182211.37061.robin.atwood@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <200904182211.37061.robin.atwood@attglobal.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904181720.44264.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: e69b9099-d1a3-461a-b2f2-f148acf0fa9b X-Archives-Hash: f10720d4191a1a76f15882fedd6b6cf6 On Saturday 18 April 2009 17:11:36 Robin Atwood wrote: > I was using net-www/netscape-flash-10.0.12.36 but the ebuild was removed > from portage and I got downgraded to www-plugins/adobe-flash-9.0.159.0 > since I had higher versions masked. I use www-plugins/nspluginwrapper-1.0.0 > with konqueror-3.5.10; when I tried to upgrade it the latest version just > segfaults so I have masked that. adobe-flash-9.0.159.0 now just causes > konqueror to freeze and 10.0.22.87 segfaults. Anyone having any success > with this? I also could never get the 64bit flash to work wiith konqueror-3.5, and nspluginwrapper simply never ever worked at all for me. I had to use firefox to view flash. Latest adobe-flash is 64 bit and works well in konqueror-4.2. Top reports around 10% cpu usage when idle, but that's probably more due to a stupid blocking IO strategy by Adobe than anything else. So as I see it your choices are: firefox kde-4 -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com