public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user]  KDE 4.2.2
@ 2009-04-07  7:40 Nikos Chantziaras
  2009-04-07 14:13 ` Momesso Andrea
  2009-04-07 14:21 ` Paul Hartman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2009-04-07  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Is there a plan/roadmap for when KDE 4.2.2 will appear in Portage? 
Unfortunately, http://kde.gentoo.org doesn't seem to be updated at all.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user]  KDE 4.2.2
  2009-04-07  7:40 [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2.2 Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2009-04-07 14:13 ` Momesso Andrea
  2009-04-07 14:21 ` Paul Hartman
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Momesso Andrea @ 2009-04-07 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 396 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:40:36AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Is there a plan/roadmap for when KDE 4.2.2 will appear in Portage? 
> Unfortunately, http://kde.gentoo.org doesn't seem to be updated at all.
>
You should subscribe the [gentoo-desktop] mailing list. Lately the
gentoo-kde team is active in that list with their announcements.

---
TopperH
http://topperh.blogspot.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2.2
  2009-04-07  7:40 [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2.2 Nikos Chantziaras
  2009-04-07 14:13 ` Momesso Andrea
@ 2009-04-07 14:21 ` Paul Hartman
  2009-04-07 16:01   ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Hartman @ 2009-04-07 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> Is there a plan/roadmap for when KDE 4.2.2 will appear in Portage?
> Unfortunately, http://kde.gentoo.org doesn't seem to be updated at all.

For the latest KDE stuff use layman and add the kde-testing overlay.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user]  Re: KDE 4.2.2
  2009-04-07 14:21 ` Paul Hartman
@ 2009-04-07 16:01   ` Nikos Chantziaras
  2009-04-07 16:13     ` Paul Hartman
  2009-04-07 16:45     ` Alan McKinnon
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2009-04-07 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
>> Is there a plan/roadmap for when KDE 4.2.2 will appear in Portage?
>> Unfortunately, http://kde.gentoo.org doesn't seem to be updated at all.
> 
> For the latest KDE stuff use layman and add the kde-testing overlay.

What happens when the ebuilds move to the tree?  Will I need to rebuild 
again?  And when ebuilds get changed, to they do revbumps in the 
overlay?  And when there are revbumps in the overlay, will they stay 
rev-bumbed when they enter the tree or are they reset to rev 0?  And why 
are all the ebuilds in the overlay in slot 0 instead of 4.2?

Yeah I know, too many questions :P




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE 4.2.2
  2009-04-07 16:01   ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2009-04-07 16:13     ` Paul Hartman
  2009-04-07 16:45     ` Alan McKinnon
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Hartman @ 2009-04-07 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a plan/roadmap for when KDE 4.2.2 will appear in Portage?
>>> Unfortunately, http://kde.gentoo.org doesn't seem to be updated at all.
>>
>> For the latest KDE stuff use layman and add the kde-testing overlay.
>
> What happens when the ebuilds move to the tree?  Will I need to rebuild
> again?  And when ebuilds get changed, to they do revbumps in the overlay?
>  And when there are revbumps in the overlay, will they stay rev-bumbed when
> they enter the tree or are they reset to rev 0?  And why are all the ebuilds
> in the overlay in slot 0 instead of 4.2?
>
> Yeah I know, too many questions :P

If it's the same version you won't have to recompile. Typically the
updates happen first in the overlay and then move to the tree, so by
using the overlay you get to skip the waiting period (at the expense
of /potential/ problems, though I haven't had any). Sometimes the USE
flags change so if you use --newuse you might run into some of that,
but that happens with non-KDE stuff in the normal portage tree, too.

If I look at the KDE ebuilds none of them should be in slot 0.
Everything from the KDE release should be either in slot 3.5 or 4.2.
Some KDE-compatible apps, however, like k3b, koffice, Amarok etc are
not part of the main KDE release and will use their own slot strategy
(and their own versioning strategy as well).



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user]  Re: KDE 4.2.2
  2009-04-07 16:01   ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
  2009-04-07 16:13     ` Paul Hartman
@ 2009-04-07 16:45     ` Alan McKinnon
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-04-07 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:01:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> >> Is there a plan/roadmap for when KDE 4.2.2 will appear in Portage?
> >> Unfortunately, http://kde.gentoo.org doesn't seem to be updated at all.
> >
> > For the latest KDE stuff use layman and add the kde-testing overlay.
>
> What happens when the ebuilds move to the tree?  

Overlay ebuilds are for testing. You have no guarantee they are compatible 
with what is in the tree.

> Will I need to rebuild
> again?  

In an ideal world, you shouldn't have to. In this real world, I find I have 
to. Mixing tree and the kde overlays tends to produce weird things on my box 
that go away when I use exclusively one or the other.

> And when ebuilds get changed, to they do revbumps in the
> overlay?  

No. The overlay moves on to testing the next latest greatest thing.

> And when there are revbumps in the overlay, will they stay
> rev-bumbed when they enter the tree or are they reset to rev 0?

There is no direct connection between an overlay and the tree, it's like this 
for all overlays. If konqueror-4.2.2-r42 from the overlay is added to the 
tree, it is added as konqueror-4.2.2.

Why? Well, this is how portage works.

> And why
> are all the ebuilds in the overlay in slot 0 instead of 4.2?

They are not.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-07 16:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-07  7:40 [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2.2 Nikos Chantziaras
2009-04-07 14:13 ` Momesso Andrea
2009-04-07 14:21 ` Paul Hartman
2009-04-07 16:01   ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-04-07 16:13     ` Paul Hartman
2009-04-07 16:45     ` Alan McKinnon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox