From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lr0sr-00017C-7Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:17:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD42BE01B9; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.shawcable.com (shawmail.shawcable.com [64.59.128.220]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE43E01B9 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bpd2mi1no-svcs.prod.shawcable.com ([10.0.184.120]) by bpd2mo3no-ssvc.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2009 20:17:51 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=prVVSIY0HtDdSbmRtIgA:9 a=26BKzLiQ6pvuma88gE59hQHWeXsA:4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.39,334,1235977200"; d="scan'208";a="168998303" Received: from unknown (HELO bpd2mi1no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com) ([192.168.183.120]) by bpd2mi1no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2009 20:17:51 -0600 X-reinject: true Received: from s01060050da7ae68c.ed.shawcable.net (HELO syscon4.localdomain) ([68.148.245.78]) by bpd2mi1no-dmz.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2009 20:17:51 -0600 Received: by syscon4.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A8665C3A8B; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:19:09 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:19:09 -0600 From: Joseph To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2 Message-ID: <20090407021909.GM6904@syscon4.inet> References: <1238747642.49d5c9fa80017@imp.free.fr> <20090406060221.GH6904@syscon4.inet> <20090406220004.7ea80d5e@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090406220004.7ea80d5e@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: b4618895-2686-4bbd-8293-21f9fd3096ba X-Archives-Hash: 79d7f8b88a9993bcc1e6ab889a0496da On 04/06/09 22:00, Jorge Morais wrote: >On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600 >> >> I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64 >> I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems. >> an examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my previous settings: >> -march=athlon64 and it compiled on first pass. >> So, now I'm recompiling the system with my old flag: -march=athlon64 :-/ >> >Have you filed a bug? >Since in a later message you say that you are not sure of whether you >should use -march=k8 or -march=k8-sse3, it seems that in your situation >-march=native is interesting. I'm not sure of anything, I'm getting deeper an deeper problems. I've almost recompile the system with -march=k8 and the last package gcc-4.3.2 wouldn't compile, the session got stuck so I kill the session and couldn't start the restart the "emerge gcc" as the emerge from previous session lock the portage or gcc. I boot from CD, chroot and tried to recompile the gcc but it has been compiling for over two hours and it can not finish, I think it is in some kind of loop mode? -- Joseph