From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LqzdK-0006MC-6d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:57:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BFD4E0388; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.158]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E738E0388 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so1744333ywm.46 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9NW/wwk9iHO4ymkKAlpEthaXPD8KjiummLbfKApWL6M=; b=OhrhsJNhge7zLyTAhlIEtdVnxMJPhWP6VSWN0bxvW9jcl4cv4pZdwCz6m3QoV7qwfP EjrnHmQiQfWSWwLXghh7b2Jj8UNaBdEWYYQOzG3Z6/ghrs+oUgsl1AztmLmUVzwPqLtM jxkhxTMIAP7Ie87wzpioi10D24IzAuW5V6zFk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MZ5Tf1AixdidsTMjHhP+nA+XlX9I7t3VW4ZN0FljaBSByO0ciE0AT5VTs5w1G3JQSi yiYZvACWYKFN3Nybpzh6h9OR+hr5dzuIcckD6nKo3uOn7D8EYXHRao2oQD0ekp2d89tF XBUNB+45mn1XMC2YU5SgL/sRR6SwfzknkOtQ4= Received: by 10.101.71.3 with SMTP id y3mr9628103ank.62.1239065864808; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (201-74-136-60-sj.cpe.vivax.com.br [201.74.136.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm10245317ywg.24.2009.04.06.17.57.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:00:04 -0300 From: Jorge Morais To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2 Message-ID: <20090406220004.7ea80d5e@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090406060221.GH6904@syscon4.inet> References: <1238747642.49d5c9fa80017@imp.free.fr> <20090406060221.GH6904@syscon4.inet> Organization: ITA X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0c102ae0-eb0b-4df5-9e1c-95dafab65722 X-Archives-Hash: b27bb4c84127b3d02641462d1fb538be On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600 Joseph wrote: > On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierjean@free.fr wrote: > >Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and > >performed "emerge system" ? > >What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... > > > >-- > > ~adj~ > > I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64 > I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems. > an examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my previous settings: > -march=athlon64 and it compiled on first pass. > So, now I'm recompiling the system with my old flag: -march=athlon64 :-/ > Have you filed a bug? Since in a later message you say that you are not sure of whether you should use -march=k8 or -march=k8-sse3, it seems that in your situation -march=native is interesting. -- Software is like sex: it is better when it is free. --Linus Torvalds