From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LqhtX-0006Pd-QS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 06:01:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BE7EE05A0; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.shawcable.com (shawmail.shawcable.com [64.59.128.220]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1548E05A0 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bpd2mi1no-svcs.prod.shawcable.com ([10.0.184.120]) by bpd2mo3no-ssvc.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2009 00:01:17 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=7Besby0On2I6MtR25N0A:9 a=ccIvf0T5DXVHwPJ-9b5LUE5fL6QA:4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.39,328,1235977200"; d="scan'208";a="168394925" Received: from unknown (HELO bpd2mi1no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com) ([192.168.183.120]) by bpd2mi1no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2009 00:01:17 -0600 X-reinject: true Received: from s01060050da7ae68c.ed.shawcable.net (HELO syscon4.localdomain) ([68.148.245.78]) by bpd2mi1no-dmz.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2009 00:01:05 -0600 Received: by syscon4.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3658C3A8A; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600 From: Joseph To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2 Message-ID: <20090406060221.GH6904@syscon4.inet> References: <1238747642.49d5c9fa80017@imp.free.fr> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1238747642.49d5c9fa80017@imp.free.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 314493e9-a1f8-456d-ac5d-cf6ccb8fb9f3 X-Archives-Hash: 5d1348fd65e32a8c8d3389fb2694b2ed On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierjean@free.fr wrote: >Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and >performed "emerge system" ? >What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... > >-- > ~adj~ I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64 I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems. an examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my previous settings: -march=athlon64 and it compiled on first pass. So, now I'm recompiling the system with my old flag: -march=athlon64 :-/ -- Joseph