From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LlSAE-0007Ne-7v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:12:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 332B2E097B; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f163.google.com (mail-ew0-f163.google.com [209.85.219.163]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C959AE097B for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so1089918ewy.34 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=Aa28vOBrUsr5d+6aFUSxOYFhJ6QHUAbCGlBDKY9JLxU=; b=rV3mGtjxKh3VPE7GbGxwtKcUfAwuz2WhxWztwK3BcRnh6FZ/LdzlIJLfQTesbmHxpA 4zsKv/PMYEku8QyMtYzIkWVAHqbT6XEvfZ8qhpDqquO12Bw4eemDk6GFv9ZpzOz6hjCd d6Q8cIDw38gOouAXeNBoTR8Jq0usYycQzEhYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=WLn0KiR1C0LoDVgJ/fhkE/73Q8YGeglje7YlgRSytLGmiarTGvh4McuXqMKeCiUd0O 5RpyUkjeycuMuiDJB/5Vc+tCkpk6iWXf4KsxDp+ZjAY8PgPcd9Ok7B2bqi1TxfGmX5+U go4v8g/NNAnx7dXEK6JYRTpuog81RghO0Zkck= Received: by 10.210.33.3 with SMTP id g3mr2688702ebg.21.1237745568271; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-153-139-rrdg-esr-2.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.153.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm269059eyb.40.2009.03.22.11.12.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:12:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] resolving this block Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:11:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.28-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <20090321211752.GC27682@anton.digitaltorque.ca> <49C56A1C.6090206@gmail.com> <20090322153555.GF27682@anton.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20090322153555.GF27682@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903222011.19631.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 6b1fdb7e-4371-4b17-9a37-63c0a261b184 X-Archives-Hash: 2e8aa91db5c514f7bfa84c66d959b0ae On Sunday 22 March 2009 17:35:56 Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 21/03/09 Nick Fortino said: > > Hmm, that's odd. gtk+ does flag the fact that it includes gail with the > > block you are running into, and gail-1000 is used to make programs which > > depend on gail happy. emerge -uDN world should really just take care of > > this, as gail should be upgraded to gail-1000. > > At the end of the day, Daniel is right, unmerging gail should resolve the > > block, and everything should work when you are done upgrading. Portage > > should (and did for me) take care of this on it's own though. > > Hmm. Is it possible that I don't have the latest portage? > > I have sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.7. > > emerge --pretend --update sys-apps/portage > > shows nothing so I guess I have the latest one... You have the latest *stable* portage. There are others in the unstable branch with the latest cutting-edge features. Lucky for us, Zac has done an excellent job in the last year of stopping just short of the bleeding edge -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com