From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lfs3n-0001x3-Vc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:39:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40F85E029E; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 08:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f173.google.com (mail-ew0-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D315FE029E for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 08:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so299959ewy.34 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:39:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=i1Fccsc0zu/6ZQBQJRFk34JnGBNiY6jB4kXLvic3EyM=; b=S7UtwHNqVxslXp76G2Ah6LlesHaAaq/0NAJlvgfrqiGO9Dkyz2Tg0EVruIhjy5RrER xutvurRWMuOaBjczz4AL3qj5LqsClW6hZMY7X4h/7Bi7yfzEUUMa6lSGStvd3uUhm3tL FMuA9wbaCNxHCL8/pnwbnK6+mTzdx90XZ7oa8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=D7CSNCdDmAv8/VCVqob/Ge6XQinhAtL4EXzm4aemhC8Te5J1MfWFmcW/L9VHNSpfCx bbP9/PfwJu6IL8FAJAg9wVH3LCFzv5MGyCfC+RJFGfAQc05uarkm82JwWZlBLWv39dJh 66AV7edmrMBZP9vDgNEdQyvGPuB+DR+oIlnto= Received: by 10.210.65.17 with SMTP id n17mr588668eba.48.1236415145286; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:39:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-153-49-rrdg-esr-2.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.153.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d26sm3568218nfh.4.2009.03.07.00.39.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:39:04 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2.1 lancelot using 100% of a core Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:37:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.28-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Roy Wright References: <49B21C42.3090903@wright.org> <200903070926.59696.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <49B22C7A.5010905@wright.org> In-Reply-To: <49B22C7A.5010905@wright.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903071037.43615.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 6684030e-34a9-473e-9e50-736ca389de2c X-Archives-Hash: eb9b7e3c43f5b37c490ead154e56b91c On Saturday 07 March 2009 10:12:42 Roy Wright wrote: > Yes, no issues with kde 4.2.0. What happened is I'd upgraded to the bad > nvidia-drivers-180.35, downgraded to 180.29, then upgraded kde from > 4.2.0 to 4.2.1. One weird side-effect of the 4.2.1 upgrade is that I > lost my plasma desktop layout. No biggy, I just added the plasmoids > back. Then I noticed the lancelot cpu usage issue. I have not noticed > any behavior problems. Kde 4.2 has been rock solid. I followed the exact same steps (even the nvidia upgrade-downgrade cycle) on my notebook with no problems whatsoever. The only difference is I have ~amd64 > ~x86 system > > emerge --info at http://pastebin.com/m6914fe90 (1 month duration) > > lshw at http://pastebin.com/m5a355800 (1 month duration) > > All I can think to try is to move my ~/.kde4.2 directory and let it > regenerate. That's a good quick easy check. At least we'll know if it's a code or a config issue -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com