From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lcdo6-00022D-7F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:49:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB2CEE020C; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (s15216962.onlinehome-server.info [217.160.22.205]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E18E020C for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (8.13.3/8.13.3) with UUCP id n1QAnUxq006050 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:49:30 +0100 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id n1QAlg7H029550 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:47:42 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:47:41 +0100 From: Enrico Weigelt To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] a multi-process browser? Message-ID: <20090226104741.GF12295@nibiru.local> References: <49979292.4020103@realss.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49979292.4020103@realss.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof X-Archives-Salt: a8bdabb4-ac9e-4c9e-bb78-d42426780a78 X-Archives-Hash: d676ec9dec10430a30b01b0a2f0c527e * zhangweiwu@realss.com wrote: > I always wonder if I can run firefox multi-process instead of > multi-threads. No, it's now discussed for years, but nothing really happened yet. Actually, I doubt that it will ever happen. They didnt event get the plugins running in their own process - the major issues known for now about 10 years obviously dont matter ;-o I've looked into the issue a while ago, but the whole codebase is that extremly complex and fat that its far too much for doing it by just one person in spare time ;-o cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------