From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcR9g-0007SP-Ui for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:19:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7DFAE05F9; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f175.google.com (mail-fx0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DC0E05F9 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so178907fxm.34 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:18:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-homepage:x-operating-system :user-agent; bh=GLSXxdUQZ9/6U16LOpKrmV8k04tqldSYu4WMfZ9RBO8=; b=b1KQ7P+9A5yo0/JjaxzT5/4wmFghS6kIRxt1Z917s56jN91CtAd3d6KR/T+Xq8meVA sxxgKhFMyY80xPdJUVHE94md4SG8P6gZorYGulO/MOza159iWgNgPGjjEiCnFQE+C03T BiOKUd9gVb87koFYtT2Z86QJS4fjJBMFFkPHA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :x-homepage:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=jwj3um9EbccVs5MoQ1zn3PHv/u4LCe0/OzoI8YhQMSVhVkF4PppwrDd4y4rZmnQSNo rbBcRXoES7EE3WiQnnhm5ila75pjpiPwM6rF+F/h2L1tCSpkLw82XRrIK//3PzaujH2Z Bgi8quIqH1656WPk33hJ3PNoXwiTjXR+PnNHg= Received: by 10.86.50.8 with SMTP id x8mr1365333fgx.14.1235596738940; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:18:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from cubotto.ath.cx (host199-245-dynamic.0-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.0.245.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm4266141fga.50.2009.02.25.13.18.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:18:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:13:26 +0000 From: Momesso Andrea To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] update to portage 2.2 Message-ID: <20090225221326.GA31038@cubotto.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <60a795cd0902250829y59c3b087g47518834f1bb7ffd@mail.gmail.com> <20090225200336.18c0bb83@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <20090225201138.GA7096@revolver> <200902252124.40856.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902252124.40856.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Homepage: http://topperh.blogspot.com X-Operating-System: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 7d53e6ac-6585-4452-9598-0f2e1b5a89e9 X-Archives-Hash: fe1a0173e298dcaba4c427e3ca063997 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:24:40PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Mittwoch 25 Februar 2009, Momesso Andrea wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0000, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:42:13 -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > > > > >> Hi! I want to update portage to get new features, mostly sets for > > > > >> kde4.2. > > > > > > > > Hint: EAPI 2 are aquired using portage-2.1.6.7 . portage-2.2... are > > > > not stable yet. > > > > > > No, but they are stable, and required for sets as the OP wanted. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Neil Bothwick > > > > > > Why is the word abbreviation so long? > > > > Doesn't look really stable: > > > > # Zac Medico (05 Jan 2009) > > # Portage 2.2 is masked due to known bugs in the > > # package sets and preserve-libs features. > > > > >=3Dsys-apps/portage-2.2_pre >=20 > as long as you don't use the preserved-libs feature (turn it off in make.= conf)=20 > you'll be fine. And what about the sets bug? Is it safe to use sets? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D TopperH =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmlwoYACgkQTusdC+HYtiLmEQCgkNZgX2F/HzCwAR+s5GXWxGkO rKAAniNqJ8IjEFIcculISXtEwMP7XxFQ =B4U/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--