From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcRqI-00032J-Ru for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:03:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98B34E03EC; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473B3E03EC for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47F0247E31D for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:02:53 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] update to portage 2.2 Message-ID: <20090225220253.71a4dc65@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090225201138.GA7096@revolver> References: <60a795cd0902250829y59c3b087g47518834f1bb7ffd@mail.gmail.com> <200902251736.04630.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <49A582F5.203@yahoo.com.br> <20090225200336.18c0bb83@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <20090225201138.GA7096@revolver> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0cvs73 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/HEznJclGb.C1t6808yeMS/D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 998733e7-7808-4e4e-b25c-1a7b540815e5 X-Archives-Hash: 55efd206df50dc9257167006575c27e4 --Sig_/HEznJclGb.C1t6808yeMS/D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote: > > No, but they are stable, and required for sets as the OP wanted. > Doesn't look really stable: >=20 > # Zac Medico (05 Jan 2009) > # Portage 2.2 is masked due to known bugs in the > # package sets and preserve-libs features. > >=3Dsys-apps/portage-2.2_pre =20 That depends on the severity of the known bugs, and the likelihood of meeting them. The only real bug I've had is that I had to emerge @preserved-rebuild several times, after one update, before it would go away. A waste of CPU cycles but hardly a stability threat. --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 12: Plastic glasses --Sig_/HEznJclGb.C1t6808yeMS/D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmlwBEACgkQum4al0N1GQMO+gCgi8oluQKELyjz5S0TfBNi5K/r 8hgAni2IkNYlXfaHNR3U6tz/sqU9Am+z =lmZ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/HEznJclGb.C1t6808yeMS/D--