From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZAAQ-0004FV-7Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:34:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 459D8E03BC; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21A6E03BC for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rohan.altum.de (achn-4db49ad7.pool.einsundeins.de [77.180.154.215]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML2xA-1LZAAN1fba-0006zo; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:34:11 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1657000B1 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:34:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from gondolin.localnet (gondolin.altum.de [192.168.1.4]) (Authenticated sender: heini) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 529EE7000AA for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:34:08 +0100 (CET) From: Dirk Heinrichs Organization: Privat To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo as a production server - insecure? Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:33:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.28.5; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) References: <6b16fb4c0902160405t6a2fcd3alb069d8e1a869e509@mail.gmail.com> <200902161833.38055.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8078437.RxAyGm481p"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200902162134.05765.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+y5u3S/fihTGBHB16v3yBBkeSG5bUBdQCs+dT kFeIXTR/sWMD4HflIwtT2C4LIXZfapDVzT2WDJz8F52ekUthDS uhA7ERJcuc/EZSl/Ukcmw== X-Archives-Salt: 292b8242-f37b-4f6b-b01f-501677adecf0 X-Archives-Hash: 70d613ed0785e972cc263d5a4ded02ea --nextPart8078437.RxAyGm481p Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 16. Februar 2009 21:15:50 schrieb james: > Um, you must not have read the response. I didn't reply to you, but to Johannes. Maybe your email client doesn't=20 display the threads correctly. You can verify this by reading the headers,= =20 especially "In-reply-to:". > I did specifically address and provide remedy if indeed having gcc > installed on a machine is a security threat. The original thread was about "Mailing Lists" to discuss about python or pe= rl=20 and was started by Kaushal Shriyan. It was hijacked by replying to it and=20 changing the topic, again see the "In-reply-to:" header. Bye... Dirk --nextPart8078437.RxAyGm481p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBJmc298NVtnsLkZ7sRAr5fAJ9c8ZOB7QuEbDcrvOwv/Mtd/T0PpACdGwfP mo4GxGztY7tOkFY0urP88lw= =2/ze -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8078437.RxAyGm481p--