From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYxi5-0001uD-Nz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:16:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0813E02F2; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f205.google.com (mail-bw0-f205.google.com [209.85.218.205]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7AEE02F2 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so3024810bwz.10 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:16:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=zmak2YpELy22Cdv8fufyMajQFVugxL/p/ZrX69vlyZ8=; b=m0nLihYMjDOYLDlMquu6XwOoSqOxabnZ5c0h/VdX88NOKnwmgqn0skFLsxsBuh37fx AcRxrusDm/HhMWEgL0sl5T+uDplWwACMRK5N/wbSxIC58t1G416MvDAixRWSA/9YhaC3 9Pw9TDH+Y/99ZJigRtkF5wXZcPG0wLPYdo2xk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=uRiFWAHYfVeYsx16/pq43FIj7oYGXxKeAy8BLih9k4743cYFcMszVcd91O/L2aVLtf Yply02+Ur1+ray38JujrFj5CqjqqPjklTzc9WRSfgtsFWkdXcwwQheq7+d9qrcvJEGGZ j6Noqa1+nmJv8znImEnGxJhnnppQoiHH9EOlY= Received: by 10.223.113.136 with SMTP id a8mr1554601faq.76.1234768566459; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:16:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from lappy.study (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x37sm17058613ugc.15.2009.02.15.23.16.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:16:05 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] trouble with evince (mime bad?) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:15:52 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <4998B91F.9030605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4998B91F.9030605@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1388369.vcXOxaVUpi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200902160716.04182.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 3765995f-1f30-4f81-8a0a-8e58d406524d X-Archives-Hash: 5211375b4ddd9148d15a32ee10f69774 --nextPart1388369.vcXOxaVUpi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 16 February 2009, Dale wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: > > PS In this mailing list the custom and member preference is not to top > > post. That is, we prefer to have replies after (or interspersed with) > > the original, not before it. > > Bottom post and text only is preferred. I think replies in the middle > are OK. Sort of keeps some things in context too. Not to forget trimming the 2 pages of previous historic messages and leavin= g=20 in only what is relevant to the current stage in the conversation ... =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1388369.vcXOxaVUpi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmZErQACgkQ5Fp0QerLYPelfgCgl+aH/5f0ffcGT0BwjkTRH2wz XY8AoKqoU0SeLGn4j5q1R+a5Ds1GjWd/ =s7BJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1388369.vcXOxaVUpi--